Since the president technically doesnt have any tope end clearance and can
see anything, does he have the privilege to disseminate secret information
at whim? strictly from a legal perspective, not whether its right or wrong
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would call him a dolt, except that it would be insulting to dolts.
>
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
> On 2/20/2017 1:30 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
>
>> No. He heard "something" on Fox about "something" in Sweden. He put 2 and
>> 2 together and got 11.
>>
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>> On 2/20/2017 1:22 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>>
>>> I am guessing something happened in some other country and he got
>>> confused.
>>> Or, better yet, he was spilling the beans on some kind of intelligence
>>> without thinking.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message----- From: Bill Prince
>>> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 1:41 PM
>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Politics
>>>
>>> Is that what happened in Sweden? Sweden! Sweden? Sweden!
>>>
>>> Really? Sweden?!?
>>>
>>>
>>> bp
>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>
>>> On 2/20/2017 11:37 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> From the news:
>>>>
>>>> Russia's ambassador to the United Nations . . . died suddenly after
>>>> falling ill Monday in his office at the mission.
>>>>
>>>> We all know what that means...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
