I think you are asking if the espionage act applies to the president..
Well the law is about anyone transferring secrets to someone who isn't
entitled to it. So yep, he could do that. And trigger congress to
act against him just like if he violated any other law.
On 02/20/2017 01:35 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
Since the president technically doesnt have any tope end clearance and
can see anything, does he have the privilege to disseminate secret
information at whim? strictly from a legal perspective, not whether its
right or wrong
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com
<mailto:part15...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I would call him a dolt, except that it would be insulting to dolts.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 2/20/2017 1:30 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
No. He heard "something" on Fox about "something" in Sweden. He
put 2 and 2 together and got 11.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 2/20/2017 1:22 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
I am guessing something happened in some other country and
he got confused.
Or, better yet, he was spilling the beans on some kind of
intelligence without thinking.
-----Original Message----- From: Bill Prince
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 1:41 PM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Politics
Is that what happened in Sweden? Sweden! Sweden? Sweden!
Really? Sweden?!?
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 2/20/2017 11:37 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com
<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>From the news:
Russia's ambassador to the United Nations . . . died
suddenly after falling ill Monday in his office at the
mission.
We all know what that means...
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
