That sounds nice of you :-)

Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.


> On Mar 24, 2017, at 11:26 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I am going to fix this little problem...
>  
> Netonix will fix your port for something like $25
>  
> From: Bill Prince
> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 8:56 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Fw: Netonix
>  
> Yeah. We accidentally hooked up an AF24 through a Cambium surge suppressor, 
> and it fragged the port on the Netonix. We were swapping from something else 
> that had been on the cable, and completely forgot that it was going through 
> that surge suppressor. Hard lesson learned.
> 
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
> 
>> On 3/24/2017 1:27 PM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>> OK,  had an exchange with Netonix today.  It is just as Matt Hoppes said.  
>> You short out their POE and it will blow the Ethernet transformer. 
>>  
>> I really presumed they had circuitry like Forrest that could detect and shut 
>> down in an over current situation.  They do have poly fuses which are slow 
>> to react and may protect it from a very brief short, but longer    shorts 
>> will indeed harm the port feeding the transformer. 
>>  
>> So, Netonix is not active POE.  I would say that on passive POE a plain 
>> surge suppressor should not be used.  I am working some “non plain” surge 
>> suppressors now.... ;-)  Stay tuned to this bat channel and a big thanks to 
>> Matt for forcing me to learn something new.  It was painful, but I can do 
>> painful things when I have to. 
>>  
>> From: Chuck McCown
>> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 10:01 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Netonix
>>  
>> tnx
>>  
>> From: Josh Luthman
>> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 9:47 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Netonix
>>  
>> chris.sisler
>> ( A )
>> netlinx.net
>>  
>>  
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>  
>>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>     Anyone know the email for the guy that runs Netonix?
> 

Reply via email to