Lots. Lots of places.
I’ve got, and can get fiber up main roads in neighborhoods very easily. What costs me is the last mile backbone that winds across streets and through ROW in front of houses etc. That is the majority of my costs right there. If I can get in with ‘normal’ wireless pricing per AP/CPE but at 1000Mbps I can do the hybrid model easily at much less costs. It will be amazing for potential customers at the moment. Might not hold up over time as bandwidth needs increase, but provides an immediate solution at a fraction of the cost of fiber, with the ‘feel’ of fiber. From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Colin Stanners Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 2:29 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It? How many places do you want to install a PtMP system that goes a maximum of 1000-2000ft distance, that fiber does not work? On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Sterling Jacobson <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: What am I missing here? Can't Cambium and UBNT and others simply overlay the same radio architecture/software they have developed over a decade, on top of a 60GHz radio instead of 5Ghz? Is there some fundamental problem with using the same PHY later protocols on 60GHz vs 5GHz?
