Very location specific. None of our towers would be able to serve anyone
with that kind of range.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 5/8/2017 2:15 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
Indeed... don't underestimate what can be done with a 2000' range. I
can probably cover a hundred houses with that from the tower next to
where I'm sitting.
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Gino A. Villarini <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I concur
From: Af <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on
behalf of Sterling Jacobson <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, May 8, 2017 at 4:31 PM
To: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It?
Lots.
Lots of places.
I’ve got, and can get fiber up main roads in neighborhoods very
easily.
What costs me is the last mile backbone that winds across streets
and through ROW in front of houses etc.
That is the majority of my costs right there.
If I can get in with ‘normal’ wireless pricing per AP/CPE but at
1000Mbps I can do the hybrid model easily at much less costs.
It will be amazing for potential customers at the moment.
Might not hold up over time as bandwidth needs increase, but
provides an immediate solution at a fraction of the cost of fiber,
with the ‘feel’ of fiber.
*From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Colin Stanners
*Sent:* Monday, May 8, 2017 2:29 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It?
How many places do you want to install a PtMP system that goes a
maximum of 1000-2000ft distance, that fiber does not work?
*//*
*/Gino A. Villarini/*
President
Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Sterling Jacobson
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
What am I missing here?
Can't Cambium and UBNT and others simply overlay the same
radio architecture/software they have developed over a decade,
on top of a 60GHz radio instead of 5Ghz?
Is there some fundamental problem with using the same PHY
later protocols on 60GHz vs 5GHz?
