Indeed... don't underestimate what can be done with a 2000' range. I can probably cover a hundred houses with that from the tower next to where I'm sitting.
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Gino A. Villarini <[email protected]> wrote: > I concur > > From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Sterling Jacobson < > [email protected]> > Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, May 8, 2017 at 4:31 PM > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It? > > Lots. > > > > Lots of places. > > > > I’ve got, and can get fiber up main roads in neighborhoods very easily. > > > > What costs me is the last mile backbone that winds across streets and > through ROW in front of houses etc. > > That is the majority of my costs right there. > > > > If I can get in with ‘normal’ wireless pricing per AP/CPE but at 1000Mbps > I can do the hybrid model easily at much less costs. > > > > It will be amazing for potential customers at the moment. > > > > Might not hold up over time as bandwidth needs increase, but provides an > immediate solution at a fraction of the cost of fiber, with the ‘feel’ of > fiber. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On > Behalf Of *Colin Stanners > *Sent:* Monday, May 8, 2017 2:29 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It? > > > > How many places do you want to install a PtMP system that goes a maximum > of 1000-2000ft distance, that fiber does not work? > > > > > > *Gino A. Villarini* > President > Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 > > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Sterling Jacobson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > What am I missing here? > > Can't Cambium and UBNT and others simply overlay the same radio > architecture/software they have developed over a decade, on top of a 60GHz > radio instead of 5Ghz? > > Is there some fundamental problem with using the same PHY later protocols > on 60GHz vs 5GHz? > > >
