I have a few PTP 60GHz links at 1500 meters working perfectly at -61. Sure it
fades in heavy rain a tiny bit, but no more than my 3 mile 24GHz links.
I also have several PtMP links as far as 800 meters working well with -65 or
better.
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
> On May 8, 2017, at 3:43 PM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Even if it existed 2000 ft is wildly optimistic. 60 GHz works at 600 meters
> (just about 2000 ft for you Americans) between two PTP dishes because you
> have 44-45dBi gain dishes on both ends. Would not be the case with any sort
> of 60 GHz sector antenna, you'd be looking at much less gain.
>
>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Very location specific. None of our towers would be able to serve anyone
>> with that kind of range.
>>
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>>> On 5/8/2017 2:15 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
>>> Indeed... don't underestimate what can be done with a 2000' range. I can
>>> probably cover a hundred houses with that from the tower next to where I'm
>>> sitting.
>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Gino A. Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> I concur
>>>>
>>>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Sterling Jacobson
>>>> <sterl...@avative.net>
>>>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>>> Date: Monday, May 8, 2017 at 4:31 PM
>>>> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It?
>>>>
>>>> Lots.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Lots of places.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I’ve got, and can get fiber up main roads in neighborhoods very easily.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What costs me is the last mile backbone that winds across streets and
>>>> through ROW in front of houses etc.
>>>>
>>>> That is the majority of my costs right there.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If I can get in with ‘normal’ wireless pricing per AP/CPE but at 1000Mbps
>>>> I can do the hybrid model easily at much less costs.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It will be amazing for potential customers at the moment.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Might not hold up over time as bandwidth needs increase, but provides an
>>>> immediate solution at a fraction of the cost of fiber, with the ‘feel’ of
>>>> fiber.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Colin Stanners
>>>> Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 2:29 PM
>>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 60Ghz PtMP, Why Doesn't Everyone Have It?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How many places do you want to install a PtMP system that goes a maximum
>>>> of 1000-2000ft distance, that fiber does not work?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gino A. Villarini
>>>>
>>>> President
>>>> Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968
>>>> <mime-attachment.png>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> What am I missing here?
>>>>
>>>> Can't Cambium and UBNT and others simply overlay the same radio
>>>> architecture/software they have developed over a decade, on top of a 60GHz
>>>> radio instead of 5Ghz?
>>>>
>>>> Is there some fundamental problem with using the same PHY later protocols
>>>> on 60GHz vs 5GHz?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
