I think the throughput should exactly match the ubnt datasheet claim and what the frequency coordinator for your link says it will do. It would be directly related to channel size and one or two polarities. In a H&V 80 MHz FDD licensed configuration it actually uses a linear 56 MHz channel in each polarity, each way, which I believe results in a 630 Mbps full duplex link.
That's assuming a properly installed link that has the right RSL on each end to be in 1024QAM mode 99.9%+ of the time of course. On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Nate Burke <n...@blastcomm.com> wrote: > Have you run BW tests on it? what kind of throughput are you 'really' > seeing? > > What Channel size Mimo/siso etc. > > On 5/25/2017 7:42 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: > > We have one up... other than some very ugly issues right after we put it > up (which was apparently a bug in the firmware they shipped with... > upgrading to the latest beta firmware fixed it), it has been working > perfectly, and I haven't touched it since. > > The AF11 is certainly worth a look in my opinion, but it all depends on > what you need it to do. > > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> > wrote: > >> Ignoring a few software bugs and delayed fixes, it's good for '2nd >> string' links. If this is for high priority link, I'd try SIAE or Cambium. >> >> Jon Langeler >> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >> >> >> On May 25, 2017, at 2:46 PM, SmarterBroadband < <li...@sbb.net> >> li...@sbb.net> wrote: >> >> We are looking to add some more Licensed Links to our network. >> >> >> >> Does anyone actually have the AF11 in service. Is it worth a look? How >> is it performing for you? Any issues? >> >> >> >> Just not sure if it is worth considering or should I be looking at >> existing companied like; >> >> >> >> Exalt ? >> >> Dragonwave ? >> >> SAIE ? >> >> >> >> Or newer ones like >> >> >> >> Alcoma >> >> Cablefree FOR3 >> >> >> >> Anyone tried the last two? >> >> >> >> Just looking for best bang for the buck in non core ring usage. >> >> > >
