this is that POE injector deal from SAF where you break the DC back out up top. When we do the next I think we will do independent DC and fiber, its probably less prone to issues
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Colin Stanners <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh you have the fancy cable. And indoors there are shielded patch cables > etc? I agree that the SSes would be suspected. Also note that if you are > using DC over a dedicated non-ethernet line and are using the SAF DC surge > protector it is possible to miswire it, I had seen someone do that. > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> BBDGE >> its got the transtector surge suppressor, I'm suspecting that, this is >> the only lik with it and both radios are doing it >> >> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Colin Stanners <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Do you have shielded cable the whole way end to end? SAFs seem to be >>> quite sensitive to that. >>> >>> On Jul 19, 2017 11:20 AM, "Steve Jones" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> So ive been dealing with the SAFs and the mikrotiks being uppity with >>>> one another. >>>> SAF has a gigabit port, but it only offers the option to lock it to >>>> 100, not gigabit. >>>> so I have the mikrotiks set, just not the otherside, the port still >>>> flaps on both radios >>>> >>>> what was happening is everytime it flaps, the interface dropped in ospf >>>> and went neighbor down, rerouting traffic then coming back up >>>> >>>> what I did was made a bridge, added that port to it, and put the ospf >>>> ip on the bridge itself, this allows the port to flap without the ospf >>>> interface going down until we work throught the issue with SAF >>>> >>>> I'm wondering if this is causing some other harm having it on the >>>> bridge, rather than the physical port >>>> >>> >> >
