Point taken

On Sep 2, 2017 6:01 PM, "Darin Steffl" <darin.ste...@mnwifi.com> wrote:

> Steve,
>
> If you're having this much trouble, your decision tree is messed up
> somewhere. We've never had them ask for any MAC address for anything. They
> generally take calls well for the most part. Sometimes there's a call that
> I think WTF are you doing but not many.
>
> We love having serverplus answer calls after hours for us so we at least
> know our customers get a human being if they're having trouble. Most calls
> that don't go well can be fixed with an update to our decision tree.
>
> I don't think you have your process fine tuned with them yet so I highly
> suggest you work with their team to get things figured out. They're easy to
> work with and Layne will do his best to make sure you're happy. Just tone
> down the attitude a little bit so you don't offend them or who will want to
> help you ;)
>
> On Sep 1, 2017 2:36 PM, "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> dispatching for pc support? do you charge for service calls? I can se
>> willy nilly dispatch if you charge, revenue driver.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Matt Hoppes <
>> mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
>>
>>> No.. that's what outsourced should have determined what the issue was.
>>> Radio is up... customer has no Internet - dispatch.
>>>
>>> On 9/1/17 3:14 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> We got a call today from a customer who also was down last week.....
>>>> radio looks fine.....Router has a connection.....If This Were outsourced
>>>> to tech support where they kick it back to us?
>>>>
>>>> Looks like we will be sending someone out there anyway it might even be
>>>> an id10terror....
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone
>>>>
>>>> ----- Reply message -----
>>>> From: "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
>>>> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] Serverplus/powercode users, OT
>>>> Date: Fri, Sep 1, 2017 11:39 AM
>>>>
>>>> youre not going to have them powercycle or verify things are plugged in
>>>> correctly? that's ALOT of truck rolls
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Matt Hoppes
>>>> <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net
>>>> <mailto:mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Exactly... I just signed up with SP and my decision tree is going to
>>>>     be extremely simple and straight forward... so easy even a cave man
>>>>     can do it.
>>>>
>>>>     Is your router on?   Are you connected to your router?  Can you ping
>>>>     your router?  Can you ping our modem?  Can I ping our modem?  Do you
>>>>     get proper speeds when plugged into our modem?
>>>>
>>>>     ESCALATE.   What else is there to troubleshoot locally?  Unless your
>>>>     network is @#$@#.
>>>>
>>>>     This entire process should take sub 5 minutes to complete.
>>>>
>>>>     END RESULT:
>>>>     Your computer is borked.
>>>>     Your router is borked.
>>>>     Our connection to you is borked -- dispatch.
>>>>
>>>>     On 9/1/17 8:58 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         I have good luck with ServerPlus.  Part of the quality you get
>>>>         from them
>>>>         depends on the quality of the decision tree you give them.
>>>>
>>>>         *From:* Sterling Jacobson
>>>>         *Sent:* Thursday, August 31, 2017 10:22 PM
>>>>         *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
>>>>         *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Serverplus/powercode users, OT
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         Not surprising, but sad to hear things haven’t changed one bit
>>>> with
>>>>         ServerPlus in the years since I swore I would never use them
>>>>         again, lol!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
>>>>         <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
>>>>         *Sent:* Thursday, August 31, 2017 8:45 PM
>>>>         *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
>>>>         *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Serverplus/powercode users, OT
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         Supposed to specifically state not to ask for a mac from box.
>>>>         Because it
>>>>         was an issue. But, i bet we get an accurate bill. The bills are
>>>>         always
>>>>         consistent. The level of irate i have right now excedes my bac,
>>>>         thats
>>>>         pretty high at 944 pm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         On Aug 31, 2017 9:31 PM, "Josh Luthman"
>>>>         <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
>>>>         <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>             That idea is coming from somewhere and I too would think it
>>>>         comes
>>>>             from the DT.  None of my calls say anything about MAC (we
>>>>         NAT our SM).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             Josh Luthman
>>>>             Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
>>>> <tel:(937)%20552-2340>
>>>>             Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
>>>> <tel:(937)%20552-2343>
>>>>             1100 Wayne St
>>>>             Suite 1337
>>>>             Troy, OH 45373
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Mike Hammett
>>>>         <af...@ics-il.net <mailto:af...@ics-il.net>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                 What does your DT say to do?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                 -----
>>>>                 Mike Hammett
>>>>                 Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/
>>>> >
>>>>                 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
>>>>         <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>><https://plus.google.com/+I
>>>> ntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
>>>>         <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
>>>> >><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
>>>>         <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solu
>>>> tions>><https://twitter.com/ICSIL
>>>>         <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>>
>>>>                 Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>>>                 <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix
>>>>         <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>><https://www.linkedin.co
>>>> m/company/midwest-internet-exchange
>>>>         <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>><
>>>> https://twitter.com/mdwestix
>>>>         <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>>
>>>>                 The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/
>>>>         <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>>
>>>>                 <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp
>>>>         <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg
>>>>         <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> ------------
>>>>
>>>>                 *From: *"Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
>>>>         <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>>
>>>>                 *To: *af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
>>>>                 *Sent: *Thursday, August 31, 2017 9:25:38 PM
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                 *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Serverplus/powercode users, OT
>>>>
>>>>                 Reviving a dead one, cause i can.
>>>>
>>>>                 So serverplus, no matter how many times you ask them to
>>>>         stop,
>>>>                 still asks customers for the mac off their router, even
>>>>         though
>>>>                 95 percent of the routers on the market list the
>>>> freaking
>>>>                 wireless mac. They cant seem to follow simple poe
>>>>         instructions,
>>>>                 constantly escalating (and billing) when they hook poes
>>>>         up backward.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                 If you have another option, look into it. Because right
>>>>         now, ill
>>>>                 get a follow up, solely because of this post, as i did
>>>>         from the
>>>>                 original post im replying to.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                 I dont mind our own mopes being mopes. I dont even ming
>>>> paid
>>>>                 mopes being mopes. What i dont like is mopes, billing
>>>> us for
>>>>                 mopery, and escalating response to being mopes when
>>>>         called out
>>>>                 in public only. Promising to deescalate the mopery, and
>>>>                 continuing to be mopes and billing for mopery.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                 At this point, direct dialing saudi arabia is a better
>>>>         option.
>>>>                 At least when amrut answers the phone, our customers
>>>>                 expectations drop to the level of outsource. And amrut
>>>> will
>>>>                 actually be consistent.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                 On Jul 12, 2017 7:10 AM, "Josh Luthman"
>>>>                 <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
>>>>         <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                     I'm not Direct TV and don't want to be compared to
>>>> them.
>>>>
>>>>                     Josh Luthman
>>>>                     Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
>>>>         <tel:(937)%20552-2340>
>>>>                     Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
>>>>         <tel:(937)%20552-2343>
>>>>                     1100 Wayne St
>>>>                     Suite 1337
>>>>                     Troy, OH 45373
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                     On Jul 11, 2017 10:43 PM, "Darin Steffl"
>>>>                     <darin.ste...@mnwifi.com
>>>>         <mailto:darin.ste...@mnwifi.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                         I am happy what we pay with the average hold
>>>> times
>>>>                         averaging 1-2 minutes. Our residential subs
>>>>         don't need
>>>>                         hold times any shorter than that for after hours
>>>>                         support. Compared to our other WISP's, we're the
>>>>         only
>>>>                         one that offers 24/7 support anyway so we're
>>>> already
>>>>                         ahead of the competition there.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                         I know when I call DirecTV or Verizon,
>>>>         Centurylink, I
>>>>                         almost always wait at least 3-5 minutes before I
>>>>         get a
>>>>                         rep. Not always but usually.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                         On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Josh Luthman
>>>>                         <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
>>>>         <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                             I would pay 30% more from my current rates
>>>>         to reduce
>>>>                             it to sub 30 seconds.
>>>>
>>>>                             Josh Luthman
>>>>                             Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
>>>>         <tel:(937)%20552-2340>
>>>>                             Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
>>>>         <tel:(937)%20552-2343>
>>>>                             1100 Wayne St
>>>>                             Suite 1337
>>>>                             Troy, OH 45373
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                             On Jul 11, 2017 6:36 PM, "Chuck McCown"
>>>>                             <ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>>
>>>>         wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                                 I am in the camp of “screw em”, let them
>>>>         hold or
>>>>                                 else they can call us in the morning.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                 I would probably feel different if you
>>>>         were the
>>>>                                 first point of contact for all calls.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                 But we take our calls directly during
>>>> most
>>>>                                 waking & working hours.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                 *From:*Layne Sisk
>>>>
>>>>                                 *Sent:*Tuesday, July 11, 2017 4:30 PM
>>>>
>>>>                                 *To:*af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                 *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG]
>>>>         Serverplus/powercode users, OT
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                 So Steve, I am not sure I fully
>>>>         understand the
>>>>                                 questions you are posing here, but I
>>>>         believe it
>>>>                                 is a simple integration issue that we
>>>> can
>>>>                                 resolve easily.   Since you have been
>>>>         live with
>>>>                                 us less than 2 weeks I am sure it is
>>>>         simply a
>>>>                                 setting that can be adjusted.  I will
>>>>         email you
>>>>                                 off-list so we can set up a call to
>>>>         address the
>>>>                                 concerns.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                 To address the comments mentioned by
>>>>         some others
>>>>                                 in the thread:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                  1. We do not route calls overseas
>>>>         unless it has
>>>>                                     been authorized by the ISP.  The
>>>>         exception
>>>>                                     mentioned on the list here is that
>>>>         if and
>>>>                                     ISP has a complete outage and has
>>>> 50-100
>>>>                                     calls drop into queue before the
>>>>         outage is
>>>>                                     identified we may use the overseas
>>>>         agents to
>>>>                                     simply pick up the call and confirm
>>>>         to the
>>>>                                     customer there is an outage.  Once
>>>> the
>>>>                                     outage is identified we put a
>>>>         message up on
>>>>                                     the phone system to stop the influx
>>>> of
>>>>                                     calls.  Jeremy if that was a deal
>>>>         breaker
>>>>                                     for you we would certainly have
>>>>         looked for
>>>>                                     an alternative, sorry that created a
>>>>                                     problem.  For us it is a balance to
>>>> make
>>>>                                     sure that one ISPs outage does not
>>>>         create
>>>>                                     long hold times for all other
>>>> clients.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                  2. Our average hold time is typically
>>>>         between 1
>>>>                                     and 2 minutes.  For example today
>>>> it is
>>>>                                     1:33.  Month to date it is approx.
>>>>         1:28.  It
>>>>                                     is certainly possible to shorten
>>>>         that time,
>>>>                                     but not while maintaining our
>>>> standard
>>>>                                     pricing structure.  It is a balance
>>>>         between
>>>>                                     cost and service, much in the same
>>>>         way that
>>>>                                     a WISP can usually provide more
>>>>         bandwidth
>>>>                                     but the balance between cost and
>>>>         speed has
>>>>                                     to be considered.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                  3. We definitely do not have a
>>>>         mandatory hold
>>>>                                     time, only an average which we are
>>>>         always
>>>>                                     working to decrease, most customers
>>>>         calls
>>>>                                     are answered within seconds.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                 I would pose a question to the group,
>>>>         would you
>>>>                                 be willing to pay say 30% more for the
>>>>         service,
>>>>                                 if the hold times dropped by 30
>>>>         seconds?  Most
>>>>                                 people I have spoken with have said no,
>>>>         but it
>>>>                                 was admittedly a small sample size.  We
>>>> have
>>>>                                 considered a scaled pricing model with a
>>>>         hold
>>>>                                 time SLA of  < 3 min, < 2 min, < 1 min.
>>>>          What
>>>>                                 are your thoughts?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                 Layne Sisk
>>>>
>>>>                                 ServerPlus
>>>>
>>>>                                 801.426.8283, ext 102
>>>>         <tel:801.426.8283%2C%20ext%20102>
>>>>                                 <tel:801.426.8283%2C%20ext%20102>
>>>>
>>>>                                 New logo xl <http://www.serverplus.com/
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>                                 http://i.imgur.com/VOz763A.png
>>>>
>>>>                                 http://i.imgur.com/xvQYYWa.png
>>>>                                 <https://www.facebook.com/Serv
>>>> erPlus365/
>>>>         <https://www.facebook.com/ServerPlus365/>>
>>>>
>>>>                                 http://i.imgur.com/ELG0AB1.png
>>>>                                 <https://twitter.com/RealServerPlus
>>>>         <https://twitter.com/RealServerPlus>>
>>>>
>>>>                                 Utah 100       fast50-01Inc 5000
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                 *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
>>>>         <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
>>>>                                 Behalf Of *Steve Jones
>>>>                                 *Sent:* Monday, July 10, 2017 9:49 PM
>>>>                                 *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com
>>>> >
>>>>                                 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG]
>>>> Serverplus/powercode
>>>>
>>>>                                 users, OT
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                 I also meant offlist, not OT
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                 On Jul 10, 2017 10:31 PM, "Steve Jones"
>>>>                                 <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
>>>>         <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                                     Oh yeah, the powercode ticket vs the
>>>>         email
>>>>                                     ticket formatting is night and day
>>>>         awful,
>>>>                                     why bother with an api if you cant
>>>>         actually
>>>>                                     tell what the heck is happening.
>>>> ... and
>>>>                                     the  api generated ticket cant be
>>>>         reassigned
>>>>                                     for the customer, though i believe
>>>>         thats a
>>>>                                     powercode issue... and given the
>>>> "new"
>>>>                                     powercode, i dont see that getting
>>>>                                     fixed....simon... simon, where are
>>>> you?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                     On Jul 10, 2017 10:27 PM, "Steve
>>>> Jones"
>>>>                                     <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
>>>>         <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                                         Im not sure how they pay, but it
>>>>         looks
>>>>                                         alot like when we used to
>>>>         comission new
>>>>                                         sales, a new account for each
>>>>         call based
>>>>                                         on who answered the phone.... if
>>>>         thats
>>>>                                         tje case, comission calls, then
>>>>         why bother
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                         Ive seen multiple existing
>>>> tickets
>>>>                                         restarted... bad juju on that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                         Anybody know if they actually
>>>>         look at
>>>>                                         existing tickets?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                         Closing and resolving unresolved
>>>>         issues
>>>>                                         is bad business for me too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                         Im thinking its just a matter of
>>>>         getiing
>>>>                                         on the same page, but if others
>>>>         have had
>>>>                                         similar issues and found
>>>>         workarounds ...
>>>>                                         or walked away, please let me
>>>> know.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                         Serverplus was not my first
>>>>         choice for
>>>>                                         an outsourced it, so i may be
>>>> jaded.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                                         On Jul 10, 2017 10:13 PM, "Steve
>>>>         Jones"
>>>>                                         <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
>>>>         <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                                             Not impressed, a short time
>>>>         in, by
>>>>                                             any means. Serverplus guys,
>>>> no
>>>>                                             offense, i need info to make
>>>>         this
>>>>                                             work outside a retention
>>>>         response. I
>>>>                                             know luthman uses them, but
>>>>         anyone
>>>>                                             else with powercode, please
>>>>         OT me so
>>>>                                             i can find out whats broke
>>>>         on our
>>>>                                             side before i have the boss
>>>>         talk.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>                         --
>>>>
>>>>                         Darin Steffl
>>>>
>>>>                         Minnesota WiFi
>>>>
>>>>                         www.mnwifi.com <http://www.mnwifi.com>
>>>>         <http://www.mnwifi.com/>
>>>>
>>>>                         507-634-WiFi
>>>>
>>>>                         <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi
>>>>         <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>> Like us on
>>>>                         Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi
>>>>         <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>

Reply via email to