Highly optimized, plus with web integration, there are many new features as well. A coverage map at proper 3000x3000 px resolution in RM takes 45 min on a I7 3.4 GHz system, we can do that in under 2 min. ☺ Lots of efficiencies are created, plus it works with any workstation with nothing to download.
You can also take it and put a coverage map on-line if you wish. From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 10:17 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free. I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am comfortable with RM. Always learning new stuff about it but I am pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM? From: Mitch Koep Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools The one problem I have with towercoverage is the only monthly payment option is paypal. Credit card is by far safer. I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal IMO Mitch Koep On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote: It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the data rates on? On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to ☺ Dennis Burgess www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270 x103<tel:%28314%29%20735-0270> – [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Jones Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there. I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side? For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100 RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash on something that specializes in modeling LTE. Joe On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to profile against existing cutovers. is there something as accurate as linkplanner?
