SAS’s exist in testing form - but the rules, testing procedures, equipment 
certification, etc. are not complete yet and will not be until early next year.

Mark


> On Sep 22, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> https://na.baicells.com/cbrs/ <https://na.baicells.com/cbrs/>
> 
> 
> I'm curious about how vendors are testing their SAS software, when there is 
> no SAS to test to
> 
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, aren't the 3.65GHz licenses going away in 3 years?
> 
> Rory
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] On 
> Behalf Of Jay Weekley
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 10:11 AM
> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
> 
> Is there an option to import your existing RM sites into Towercoverage?
> 
> Adam Moffett wrote:
> > The interface is different enough that you can't quickly jump from one
> > to the other.  There's some learning curve.
> >
> >
> > ------ Original Message ------
> > From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > Sent: 9/22/2017 10:17:23 AM
> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
> >
> >> The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free.
> >> I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am
> >> comfortable with RM.  Always learning new stuff about it but I am
> >> pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM?
> >> *From:* Mitch Koep
> >> *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM
> >> *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
> >>
> >> The one problem I have with towercoverage is
> >>
> >> the only monthly payment option is paypal.
> >>
> >> Credit card is by far safer.
> >>
> >> I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal
> >>
> >> IMO
> >>
> >> Mitch Koep
> >>
> >>
> >> On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
> >>> It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the
> >>> data rates on?
> >>> On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" <[email protected] 
> >>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>     Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J
> >>>
> >>>     Dennis Burgess
> >>>
> >>>     www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/> 
> >>> <http://www.linktechs.net/ <http://www.linktechs.net/>> – 314-735-0270 
> >>> <tel:314-735-0270>
> >>>     x103 <tel:%28314%29%20735-0270> – [email protected] 
> >>> <mailto:[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>>     *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>] 
> >>> *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
> >>>     *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM
> >>>     *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >>>     *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
> >>>
> >>>     yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there.
> >>>
> >>>     I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware
> >>>
> >>>     On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak <[email protected] 
> >>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >>>     wrote:
> >>>
> >>>         Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side?
> >>>
> >>>         For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and
> >>>         fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100
> >>>         RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but
> >>>         it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash
> >>>         on something that specializes in modeling LTE.
> >>>
> >>>         Joe
> >>>
> >>>         On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones
> >>>         <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>             we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to
> >>>             profile against existing cutovers. is there something as
> >>>             accurate as linkplanner?
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient
> >  
> > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>>
> >       Virus-free. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/>
> > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&u 
> > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&u>
> > tm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
> >
> >
> > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> 
> 

Reply via email to