thanks


On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Rick Harnish <rick.harn...@baicells.com>
wrote:

> We have Atoll.  Check with cameron.kil...@baicells.com, if you need
> propagation studies done.
>
>
>
> Respectfully,
>
>
>
> ---------[image: BaiCells_Tiny3]---------
>
> Rick Harnish
>
>
>
> Director of WISP Markets
>
>
>
> Baicells Technologies North America, Inc. <https://na.baicells.com/>
>
> Mobile:  (972) 922-1443
>
>
>
> rick.harn...@baicells.com
>
> www.facebook.com/baicells
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
> *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 4:48 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
>
>
>
> do you guys have a propagation/profile tool like linkplanner available, or
> in the works?
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Rick Harnish <rick.harn...@baicells.com>
> wrote:
>
> Baicells has been testing with Federated Wireless for several months.  We
> did a demo for Commissioner O’Reilly at the CBRS Alliance meeting in
> California last month.  The other things Mark mentioned can be added
> relatively easy.
>
>
>
> Respectfully,
>
>
>
> ---------[image: BaiCells_Tiny3]---------
>
> Rick Harnish
>
>
>
> Director of WISP Markets
>
>
>
> Baicells Technologies North America, Inc. <https://na.baicells.com/>
>
> Mobile:  (972) 922-1443
>
>
>
> rick.harn...@baicells.com
>
> www.facebook.com/baicells
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mark Radabaugh
> *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 2:45 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
>
>
>
> SAS’s exist in testing form - but the rules, testing procedures, equipment
> certification, etc. are not complete yet and will not be until early next
> year.
>
>
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 22, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> https://na.baicells.com/cbrs/
>
>
>
>
>
> I'm curious about how vendors are testing their SAS software, when there
> is no SAS to test to
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net>
> wrote:
>
> Just out of curiosity, aren't the 3.65GHz licenses going away in 3 years?
>
> Rory
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jay Weekley
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 10:11 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
>
> Is there an option to import your existing RM sites into Towercoverage?
>
> Adam Moffett wrote:
> > The interface is different enough that you can't quickly jump from one
> > to the other.  There's some learning curve.
> >
> >
> > ------ Original Message ------
> > From: ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>
> > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
> > Sent: 9/22/2017 10:17:23 AM
> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
> >
> >> The only problem I have with towercoverage is that I use RM for free.
> >> I have sent Roger plenty of donations over the years, but I am
> >> comfortable with RM.  Always learning new stuff about it but I am
> >> pretty proficient. Isn’t towercoverage just a web version of RM?
> >> *From:* Mitch Koep
> >> *Sent:* Friday, September 22, 2017 7:45 AM
> >> *To:* af@afmug.com
> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
> >>
> >> The one problem I have with towercoverage is
> >>
> >> the only monthly payment option is paypal.
> >>
> >> Credit card is by far safer.
> >>
> >> I did really like the test I tried but will not use paypal
> >>
> >> IMO
> >>
> >> Mitch Koep
> >>
> >>
> >> On 9/22/2017 8:35 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
> >>> It can predict performance like linkplanner? Whats it modeling the
> >>> data rates on?
> >>> On Sep 22, 2017 7:59 AM, "Dennis Burgess" <dmburg...@linktechs.net>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>     Check out towercoverage, it can do what you wish it to J
> >>>
> >>>     Dennis Burgess
> >>>
> >>>     www.linktechs.net <http://www.linktechs.net/> – 314-735-0270
> >>>     x103 <tel:%28314%29%20735-0270 <%28314%29%20735-0270>> –
> dmburg...@linktechs.net
> >>>
> >>>     *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
> >>>     *Sent:* Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:09 PM
> >>>     *To:* af@afmug.com
> >>>     *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] LTE (baicells) path propagation tools
> >>>
> >>>     yeah, I see that, looking at the software that's out there.
> >>>
> >>>     I think technology has surpassed the efficacy of freeware
> >>>
> >>>     On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com>
> >>>     wrote:
> >>>
> >>>         Can you adjust link planner for RX on the client side?
> >>>
> >>>         For tower coverage we are modeling successful at a -70 and
> >>>         fringe at a -80. We don't do installs much worse then a -100
> >>>         RSRP (around -70 RSSI). It seems to be doing okay... but
> >>>         it's hard to model otherwise without spending loads of cash
> >>>         on something that specializes in modeling LTE.
> >>>
> >>>         Joe
> >>>
> >>>         On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Steve Jones
> >>>         <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>             we are looking to deploy this. stuff but would like to
> >>>             profile against existing cutovers. is there something as
> >>>             accurate as linkplanner?
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
> > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&;
> utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
> >       Virus-free. www.avg.com
> > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&u
> > tm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
> >
> >
> > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to