My objection is not about the cost, which is nominal, but about the principle of going down the path of what can become a business-critical function offloaded to a third party, where you don't have full access to your own database/back-end.
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: > Confluence is only $10 for 10 users. That’s my recommendation. > > On Jan 20, 2018, at 12:26 PM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Full mediawiki, the same software that runs the backend of wikipedia. If > you are not a competent Linux sysadmin, you are going to want to get one to > set it up and maintain it. It's vastly more powerful and extensible than a > medium sized ISP could ever need. I predict we will see people here > recommend Confluence and other commercial solutions, but in my opinion all > proper wiki software for serious use should be composed of 100% BSD, GPL > and Apache licensed software. > > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:16 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >> I want it to be in wiki format. An ongoing knowledge base. We had one >> at a former company and it was great. But I was not the one that installed >> it so I don’t know what is involved in that. >> >> *From:* Steve Jones >> *Sent:* Saturday, January 20, 2018 10:14 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT tech wiki >> >> if its not public, i use OneNote >> its not in the wiki format but it logs changes, logs who made changes and >> allows multiuser access >> >> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 11:06 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >> >>> What is the most pain free way to create a wiki? >>> >> >> > >
