Well then you may like Confluence - especially with the Gliffy plugin which is awesome for diagrams!
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 7:42 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > My complaint with a wiki was that it was very clunky to add non-text > content. I like to use a lot of diagrams and photos. > Might give this One Note thing a spin. > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: 1/20/2018 12:49:45 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT tech wiki > > I can't say who, but one of the largest last-mile ISPs on the entire west > coast (WA/OR/CA) uses mediawiki for nearly 100% of their internal > documentation. Organized per POP. > > > > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:44 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >> Yeah, I think mediawiki is the way to go. I started down that path once >> but not being well versed in Linux I stopped. We can get that >> implemented. >> I just hate losing corporate/institutional memory every time a tech >> decides to go to college or go to work for Google/Ebay/Adobe... (we ain’t >> called Silicon Slopes for nuthing) >> >> *From:* Eric Kuhnke >> *Sent:* Saturday, January 20, 2018 10:41 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT tech wiki >> >> My objection is not about the cost, which is nominal, but about the >> principle of going down the path of what can become a business-critical >> function offloaded to a third party, where you don't have full access to >> your own database/back-end. >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Confluence is only $10 for 10 users. That’s my recommendation. >>> >>> On Jan 20, 2018, at 12:26 PM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Full mediawiki, the same software that runs the backend of wikipedia. If >>> you are not a competent Linux sysadmin, you are going to want to get one to >>> set it up and maintain it. It's vastly more powerful and extensible than a >>> medium sized ISP could ever need. I predict we will see people here >>> recommend Confluence and other commercial solutions, but in my opinion all >>> proper wiki software for serious use should be composed of 100% BSD, GPL >>> and Apache licensed software. >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:16 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I want it to be in wiki format. An ongoing knowledge base. We had one >>>> at a former company and it was great. But I was not the one that installed >>>> it so I don’t know what is involved in that. >>>> >>>> *From:* Steve Jones >>>> *Sent:* Saturday, January 20, 2018 10:14 AM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT tech wiki >>>> >>>> if its not public, i use OneNote >>>> its not in the wiki format but it logs changes, logs who made changes >>>> and allows multiuser access >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 11:06 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> What is the most pain free way to create a wiki? >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > >
