Great flick Jaime Solorza On Jan 21, 2018 1:01 PM, "Robert Andrews" <i...@avantwireless.com> wrote:
> Followed by Major Kong riding the Bomb in.... > > On 01/21/2018 08:21 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: > >> Never considered the idea of giving the customers a good self support >> tool. That is an astoundingly good idea. >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZct-itCwPE >> *From:* Jeremy >> *Sent:* Sunday, January 21, 2018 9:16 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT tech wiki >> MindTouch (Deki) Wiki? They have it in a ready-to-go linux turnkey >> distro. >> On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 8:02 AM, Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Well then you may like Confluence - especially with the Gliffy >> plugin which is awesome for diagrams! >> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 7:42 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> My complaint with a wiki was that it was very clunky to add >> non-text content. I like to use a lot of diagrams and photos. >> Might give this One Note thing a spin. >> ------ Original Message ------ >> From: "Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> >> To: af@afmug.com >> Sent: 1/20/2018 12:49:45 PM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT tech wiki >> >>> I can't say who, but one of the largest last-mile ISPs on the >>> entire west coast (WA/OR/CA) uses mediawiki for nearly 100% of >>> their internal documentation. Organized per POP. >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:44 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >>> >>> Yeah, I think mediawiki is the way to go. I started down >>> that path once but not being well versed in Linux I >>> stopped. We can get that implemented. >>> I just hate losing corporate/institutional memory every >>> time a tech decides to go to college or go to work for >>> Google/Ebay/Adobe... (we ain’t called Silicon Slopes for >>> nuthing) >>> *From:* Eric Kuhnke >>> *Sent:* Saturday, January 20, 2018 10:41 AM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT tech wiki >>> My objection is not about the cost, which is nominal, but >>> about the principle of going down the path of what can >>> become a business-critical function offloaded to a third >>> party, where you don't have full access to your own >>> database/back-end. >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Josh Baird >>> <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Confluence is only $10 for 10 users. That’s my >>> recommendation. >>> >>> On Jan 20, 2018, at 12:26 PM, Eric Kuhnke >>> <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Full mediawiki, the same software that runs the >>>> backend of wikipedia. If you are not a competent >>>> Linux sysadmin, you are going to want to get one to >>>> set it up and maintain it. It's vastly more powerful >>>> and extensible than a medium sized ISP could ever >>>> need. I predict we will see people here recommend >>>> Confluence and other commercial solutions, but in my >>>> opinion all proper wiki software for serious use >>>> should be composed of 100% BSD, GPL and Apache >>>> licensed software. >>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:16 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I want it to be in wiki format. An ongoing >>>> knowledge base. We had one at a former company >>>> and it was great. But I was not the one that >>>> installed it so I don’t know what is involved in >>>> that. >>>> *From:* Steve Jones >>>> *Sent:* Saturday, January 20, 2018 10:14 AM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT tech wiki >>>> if its not public, i use OneNote >>>> its not in the wiki format but it logs changes, >>>> logs who made changes and allows multiuser access >>>> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 11:06 AM, >>>> <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> What is the most pain free way to create a wiki? >>>> >>>>
