I like the concept, it's going to be like herding cats though...

On Tuesday, January 30, 2018, Brian Webster <i...@wirelessmapping.com>
wrote:

> In this discussion should we have it, a history of the first cellular
> networks their evolution and when the industry started to explode would
> need to be laid out.  Starting from the early 80’s on up through. This is
> important because as Gino has suggested, the WISP industry is following a
> very similar path and has always suffered from brand/product image,
> recognition and understanding. Cellular phones back then suffered the same
> problem. The word cellular was understood as a biology term by most. The
> term “Car Phones” was better understood and only those who had a lot of
> money had those and it was a party line system with no privacy. People had
> them out of extreme necessity only. The concept of anyone other than the
> phone company being able to deliver a phone service would not have ever
> seemed possible to a consumer. At that time the breakup of Ma Bell was just
> happening. A person could easily start a cellular network, no spectrum
> auctions back then. Just apply to the FCC and pay the license fees.
>
>
>
> Of an interesting side note, I had the opportunity to be working on a
> consulting project for AT&T in Portland Oregon years ago, we had to review
> leases, zoning approvals and other documents to determine if sites could be
> expanded and what work was required for same. Sometimes leases mentioned
> specific frequencies and antennas etc. so they might have to be
> renegotiated or modified to add data and new frequencies and antennas. In
> this process I had my hands on Craig McCaw’s first 4 cell tower leases on
> his first built cellular system. It was very cool to be holding that piece
> of history, his personal signature and all. Such an innovator that hadn’t
> hit his stride yet.
>
>
>
> Thank You,
>
> Brian Webster
>
> www.wirelessmapping.com
>
> www.Broadband-Mapping.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Brian Webster
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 30, 2018 5:42 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cellular One approach to WISP
>
>
>
> I won’t be there.
>
>
>
> Thank You,
>
> Brian Webster
>
> www.wirelessmapping.com
>
> www.Broadband-Mapping.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
> Behalf Of *Gino A. Villarini
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 30, 2018 2:25 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cellular One approach to WISP
>
>
>
> Should we discuss it as session at wispamerica?
>
>
>
> *From: *Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Brian Webster <
> i...@wirelessmapping.com>
> *Reply-To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 1:50 PM
> *To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Cellular One approach to WISP
>
>
>
> Absolutely. I have had a method like this in my head for year. Craig McCaw
> really helped those independent operators when he created a national
> branding for the A side cellular operators that had to compete with the B
> side that were all the established ILECs. If there were an interested group
> of WISP’s who wanted to explore the concept I would be willing to have a
> conference call and discuss.
>
>
>
> Thank You,
>
> Brian Webster
>
> www.wirelessmapping.com
>
> www.Broadband-Mapping.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
> Behalf Of *Gino A. Villarini
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 30, 2018 9:58 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Cellular One approach to WISP
>
>
>
> Hey Guys
>
>
>
> Those who know the history behind Cellular One, don’t you think this
> should be repeated in the WISP industry?
>

Reply via email to