If you look at the rest of the world, many seem to believe the US has this really weird Puritanical view of the world where gory violence is 100% okay, but you must be at least 18 years old to see a naked human being.
And they're not wrong. On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > who is filtering the analog mediums in this world? they no longer call it > "sex ed" because its now health ed and no longer is black and white science, > more soft core porn. Driving down any road where theres any one if fifty > billion "protests" going on, pussy hats, signs filled with vulgarity, women > wearing boxes with handholes to finger them through for sexual assault, > apparently its now a teachers sport to have orgies with students. women in > restauraints flopping the feedbags out and making sure everyone looks before > feeding their babies instead of just dropping a shoulder blanket, parades > full of cross dressing porn acts, and my personal favorite, our airforce > drawing huge penises in the sky (heh).. the world is gone to hell > > On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 2:26 PM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >> >> Well, not really trying to force religious ideas on the population, just >> religious ideals. >> >> The legislation is attempting to force ISPs to offer an in-house filtering >> product. >> >> Hopefully the bigger ISPs will fight it off. We have an exemption for the >> smaller ISPs. >> >> From: Josh Reynolds >> Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 1:19 PM >> To: af@afmug.com >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Porn ..... (filtering) >> >> Escape religious persecution in England to com to America. Establish new >> Mormon religion. Escape religious persecution in all kinds of places to >> finally settle in Missouri and Utah. Attempt to force religious ideas on >> population. >> >> Fucking. Morons. >> >> On Feb 7, 2018 10:23 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >>> >>> Proposed legislation in Utah. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- From: Josh Reynolds >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 9:04 PM >>> To: af@afmug.com >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Porn ..... (filtering) >>> >>> Where did this post come from? I need some backstory here. >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:07 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Based on all your comments (thank you), I sent the following to the >>>> legislative working group: >>>> (You guys helped me look smarter than I am ). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Some random thoughts. >>>> >>>> If you are going to an HTTPS site, it is all encrypted. If you are >>>> attempting to analyze a flow of traffic HTTPS traffic looks the same to >>>> us >>>> whether it is porn or online banking. >>>> >>>> Do we also block Bit Torrent? >>>> XBox Grand Theft Auto >>>> Any game with online chat. Scrub online chat during games? >>>> All game servers >>>> Twitter >>>> Instagram >>>> Youtube >>>> News outlets >>>> Facebook >>>> Email >>>> Instant messaging >>>> Periscope >>>> Streaming >>>> FTP >>>> IRC >>>> >>>> The lowly ping facility has a space for payload. I could send porn via >>>> pings if I wanted. >>>> >>>> What is defined as harmful content? Medical, artistic, Bible readings? >>>> Genesis 19, 29 etc etc. >>>> Language, if so what language? Bare shoulders. Knees? >>>> Curtains blowing in the breeze. >>>> >>>> How about what I consider pornographic music lyrics. >>>> Do we have to police music. Police Pandora. >>>> >>>> There are always ways around. >>>> For every block there is a proxy or VPN that will get you around it. >>>> >>>> Filters can give parents a false sense of security. Filters are >>>> gimmicks. >>>> Snake oil. >>>> But we do offer them. Not home grown. They are 3rd party. >>>> >>> >
