And the funniest part is that actual historical Puritans were all about
the weird sex AND public displays of it. It just couldn't be adultery.
------ Original Message ------
From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: 2/7/2018 9:20:29 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Porn ..... (filtering)
If you look at the rest of the world, many seem to believe the US has
this really weird Puritanical view of the world where gory violence is
100% okay, but you must be at least 18 years old to see a naked human
being.
And they're not wrong.
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]>
wrote:
who is filtering the analog mediums in this world? they no longer call
it
"sex ed" because its now health ed and no longer is black and white
science,
more soft core porn. Driving down any road where theres any one if
fifty
billion "protests" going on, pussy hats, signs filled with vulgarity,
women
wearing boxes with handholes to finger them through for sexual
assault,
apparently its now a teachers sport to have orgies with students.
women in
restauraints flopping the feedbags out and making sure everyone looks
before
feeding their babies instead of just dropping a shoulder blanket,
parades
full of cross dressing porn acts, and my personal favorite, our
airforce
drawing huge penises in the sky (heh).. the world is gone to hell
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 2:26 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
Well, not really trying to force religious ideas on the population,
just
religious ideals.
The legislation is attempting to force ISPs to offer an in-house
filtering
product.
Hopefully the bigger ISPs will fight it off. We have an exemption
for the
smaller ISPs.
From: Josh Reynolds
Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 1:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Porn ..... (filtering)
Escape religious persecution in England to com to America. Establish
new
Mormon religion. Escape religious persecution in all kinds of places
to
finally settle in Missouri and Utah. Attempt to force religious ideas
on
population.
Fucking. Morons.
On Feb 7, 2018 10:23 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
Proposed legislation in Utah.
-----Original Message----- From: Josh Reynolds
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 9:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Porn ..... (filtering)
Where did this post come from? I need some backstory here.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:07 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
Based on all your comments (thank you), I sent the following to the
legislative working group:
(You guys helped me look smarter than I am ).
Some random thoughts.
If you are going to an HTTPS site, it is all encrypted. If you are
attempting to analyze a flow of traffic HTTPS traffic looks the
same to
us
whether it is porn or online banking.
Do we also block Bit Torrent?
XBox Grand Theft Auto
Any game with online chat. Scrub online chat during games?
All game servers
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube
News outlets
Facebook
Email
Instant messaging
Periscope
Streaming
FTP
IRC
The lowly ping facility has a space for payload. I could send porn
via
pings if I wanted.
What is defined as harmful content? Medical, artistic, Bible
readings?
Genesis 19, 29 etc etc.
Language, if so what language? Bare shoulders. Knees?
Curtains blowing in the breeze.
How about what I consider pornographic music lyrics.
Do we have to police music. Police Pandora.
There are always ways around.
For every block there is a proxy or VPN that will get you around
it.
Filters can give parents a false sense of security. Filters are
gimmicks.
Snake oil.
But we do offer them. Not home grown. They are 3rd party.
