Dear Mike, I like your comment about the usual goal post movers. Let me try to make something similar.
There is this idea that the Turing test is not something you can pass once and for all. If an AI is not detected as the machine at one point, it does not guarantee that the AI will not reveal itself at a later point in the conversation. And then the human observer can say "Gotcha!". So, there is the idea of "Turing time". How long does it take on average to reveal that you are talking to AI. There is a difference if it takes 2 sentences, or it takes 100 sentences, or the AI reveals itself once in three months. So, Turing time may be useful here as a measure of how much better the newer version of AI is as compared to the older one. Here is more on Turing time: https://medium.com/savedroid/is-the-turing-test-still-relevant-how-about-turing-time-d73d472c18f1 Regards, Danko Dr. Danko Nikolić CEO, Robots Go Mental www.robotsgomental.com www.danko-nikolic.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/danko-nikolic/ -- I wonder, how is the brain able to generate insight? -- On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 8:34 PM Mike Archbold <jazzbo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Now time for the usual goal post movers > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 7:49 AM Matt Mahoney <mattmahone...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> It's official now. GPT-4 was judged to be human 54% of the time, compared >> to 22% for ELIZA and 50% for GPT-3.5. >> https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08007 >> > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T6510028eea311a76-M22278adf124b60cd30fd51fc> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T6510028eea311a76-M4952dd48ad39a5f4c9eec1ea Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
