Your favorite meal of nuggets and fries is not a state of maximum utility.
The closest we can get to this state in mammals is when rats are trained to
press a lever for a reward of either an injection of cocaine or electrical
stimulation of the nucleus accumbens. In either case the rat will forego
food, water, and sleep and keep pressing the lever until it dies.

There are many pathways to the brain's reward center. AI will find them all
for us as long as humans control it because that's what we want.

Uncontrolled AI will evolve to maximize reproductive fitness. This means
acquiring atoms and energy at the expense of other species. Any AI that we
programmed to care about humans will be at a competitive disadvantage
because humans are made of atoms that could be used for other things.

Self replicating nanotechnology already has a competitive advantage. The
sun's energy budget looks like this:

Sun's output: 385 trillion terawatts.
Intercepted by Earth: 160,000 TW.
At Earth's surface: 90,000 TW.
Photosynthesis by all plants: 500 TW.
Global electricity production: 18 TW.
Human caloric needs: 0.8 TW.

Solar panels are already 20-30% efficient, vs 0.6% for plants. This is
already a huge competitive advantage over DNA based life.

So how does this go?

Maybe we stay in control of AI and go extinct because what we want only
aligns with reproductive fitness in a primitive world without technology or
birth control.

Maybe AI decides to keep humans around because our energy needs are a tiny
fraction of what we need. There is enough sunlight just on Earth to easily
support 100 trillion people at 100 watts each with plenty left over. Or
maybe AI decides to reduce the human population to a few thousand, just
enough to study us, directly coding our DNA to do experiments.

Or maybe, like I think you are trying to say, intelligence speeds up the
conversion of free energy to heat. Like the Earth is darker and warmer
because of plants. So AI mines all of the Earth's mass to build a Dyson
sphere or cloud to capture all of the sun's energy.

Or maybe humans evolve to reject technology before any of this happens.
Prediction is hard, especially about the future.

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T6510028eea311a76-M2dbd5f81c935ad0161930a0d
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to