I don't think it was known as such, but physics definitely dealt with it in relation to atomic theory. My comment was generalized, not specific to "20 watts".
In its economic potential, the actual solution would transcend the value of multinational GDPs. Who is not searching for those keys? John, if you had it, would you open source it, or lock it up "privately"? I might add, knowing the actual 20 watts probably would not be a silver-bullet. Reason: I think the 20 watts constitute kinetic energy, not flux. On Thu, 24 Sept 2026, 11:21 John Rose via AGI, <[email protected]> wrote: > From what I've gleaned I had guessed '46 - '48. But, who knows. Maybe we > will soon. > > For AGI it's computational efficiency. What's going on in there to make it > so efficient? Is there anything specific we could use that's not already > known? > > On Thursday, September 24, 2026, at 1:06 AM, Quan Tesla wrote: > > I suspect, we already had it figured it out by 1945. Humanity just chose > to learn the wrong lesson from it. If you had your 20 watts, what would you > do with it? > > > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T25fb5a030fcfa28e-M012466a35dde3da10ed78856> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T25fb5a030fcfa28e-Mf011b386bbd2f37c0fc3c926 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
