(sarcasm) if only there was a way to denote sarcasm in written form. On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote:
> I forgot that Alan is only kidding about this. His humor looked a > little too real for me this time. > > Jim Bromer > > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well, Alan's response is exactly the sort of problem that I have been > > talking about. Instead of making any effort to examine how concepts > > might be compared against reality, given the basis that I stated (and > > which Alan did not seem to contest), he only claims that I will > > reinvent Eliasmith's Semantic Pointer Architecture if I spend another > > 20 years working on this. The problem, of course, is that I was not > > talking about anything of the sort. I really don't know much of > > anything about Eliasmith's theories because that is not what I have > > been interested in but I am quite sure that I will never end up there. > > > > I > > Jim Bromer > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Alan Grimes <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Jim Bromer wrote: > >>> I have tried to point out that the 'structure' of concepts must be > >>> dynamically constructed, and therefore the whole idea that concept > >>> structure is something that can be *entirely* predefined is just not > >>> sound. So, what I am trying to say is, that if you are going to have > >>> your program do some reality checking then it is going to have to be > >>> examining the structural assumptions of the model as well. This leads > >>> to some major questions. > >> > >> !!!! > >> > >> Goddamnit, now I'm obliged to dispense a motherfucking GOLD STAR. Hear > >> that punk? You just earned yourself a goddamned motherfucking GOLD STAR, > >> and obliged me to give it to you. I hope you are pleased with yourself, > >> scumbag.... > >> > >> If you think about it for twenty more years, you will re-invent > >> Eliasmith's Semantic Pointer Architecture, but hey... I have to give you > >> credit for realizing that an ontology isn't something that can just be > >> learned and optimized, it must be available for meta-programming at the > >> highest level. > >> > >> -- > >> IQ is a measure of how stupid you feel. > >> > >> Powers are not rights. > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------- > >> AGI > >> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > >> RSS Feed: > https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/24379807-653794b5 > >> Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > >> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com > > > ------------------------------------------- > AGI > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/26973278-698fd9ee > Modify Your Subscription: > https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
