[Droll Humor]? Jim Bromer
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote: > [Sarcasm]? > > Jim Bromer > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Benjamin Kapp <[email protected]> wrote: > >> (sarcasm) if only there was a way to denote sarcasm in written form. >> >> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I forgot that Alan is only kidding about this. His humor looked a >>> little too real for me this time. >>> >>> Jim Bromer >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Well, Alan's response is exactly the sort of problem that I have been >>> > talking about. Instead of making any effort to examine how concepts >>> > might be compared against reality, given the basis that I stated (and >>> > which Alan did not seem to contest), he only claims that I will >>> > reinvent Eliasmith's Semantic Pointer Architecture if I spend another >>> > 20 years working on this. The problem, of course, is that I was not >>> > talking about anything of the sort. I really don't know much of >>> > anything about Eliasmith's theories because that is not what I have >>> > been interested in but I am quite sure that I will never end up there. >>> > >>> > I >>> > Jim Bromer >>> > >>> > >>> > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Alan Grimes <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> Jim Bromer wrote: >>> >>> I have tried to point out that the 'structure' of concepts must be >>> >>> dynamically constructed, and therefore the whole idea that concept >>> >>> structure is something that can be *entirely* predefined is just not >>> >>> sound. So, what I am trying to say is, that if you are going to have >>> >>> your program do some reality checking then it is going to have to be >>> >>> examining the structural assumptions of the model as well. This leads >>> >>> to some major questions. >>> >> >>> >> !!!! >>> >> >>> >> Goddamnit, now I'm obliged to dispense a motherfucking GOLD STAR. Hear >>> >> that punk? You just earned yourself a goddamned motherfucking GOLD >>> STAR, >>> >> and obliged me to give it to you. I hope you are pleased with >>> yourself, >>> >> scumbag.... >>> >> >>> >> If you think about it for twenty more years, you will re-invent >>> >> Eliasmith's Semantic Pointer Architecture, but hey... I have to give >>> you >>> >> credit for realizing that an ontology isn't something that can just be >>> >> learned and optimized, it must be available for meta-programming at >>> the >>> >> highest level. >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> IQ is a measure of how stupid you feel. >>> >> >>> >> Powers are not rights. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> ------------------------------------------- >>> >> AGI >>> >> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now >>> >> RSS Feed: >>> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/24379807-653794b5 >>> >> Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; >>> >> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------- >>> AGI >>> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now >>> RSS Feed: >>> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/26973278-698fd9ee >>> Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; >>> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com >>> >> >> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> >> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/24379807-653794b5> | >> Modify >> <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> >> Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com> >> > > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
