[Sarcasm]? Jim Bromer
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Benjamin Kapp <[email protected]> wrote: > (sarcasm) if only there was a way to denote sarcasm in written form. > > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I forgot that Alan is only kidding about this. His humor looked a >> little too real for me this time. >> >> Jim Bromer >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Well, Alan's response is exactly the sort of problem that I have been >> > talking about. Instead of making any effort to examine how concepts >> > might be compared against reality, given the basis that I stated (and >> > which Alan did not seem to contest), he only claims that I will >> > reinvent Eliasmith's Semantic Pointer Architecture if I spend another >> > 20 years working on this. The problem, of course, is that I was not >> > talking about anything of the sort. I really don't know much of >> > anything about Eliasmith's theories because that is not what I have >> > been interested in but I am quite sure that I will never end up there. >> > >> > I >> > Jim Bromer >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Alan Grimes <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Jim Bromer wrote: >> >>> I have tried to point out that the 'structure' of concepts must be >> >>> dynamically constructed, and therefore the whole idea that concept >> >>> structure is something that can be *entirely* predefined is just not >> >>> sound. So, what I am trying to say is, that if you are going to have >> >>> your program do some reality checking then it is going to have to be >> >>> examining the structural assumptions of the model as well. This leads >> >>> to some major questions. >> >> >> >> !!!! >> >> >> >> Goddamnit, now I'm obliged to dispense a motherfucking GOLD STAR. Hear >> >> that punk? You just earned yourself a goddamned motherfucking GOLD >> STAR, >> >> and obliged me to give it to you. I hope you are pleased with yourself, >> >> scumbag.... >> >> >> >> If you think about it for twenty more years, you will re-invent >> >> Eliasmith's Semantic Pointer Architecture, but hey... I have to give >> you >> >> credit for realizing that an ontology isn't something that can just be >> >> learned and optimized, it must be available for meta-programming at the >> >> highest level. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> IQ is a measure of how stupid you feel. >> >> >> >> Powers are not rights. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------- >> >> AGI >> >> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now >> >> RSS Feed: >> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/24379807-653794b5 >> >> Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; >> >> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com >> >> >> ------------------------------------------- >> AGI >> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now >> RSS Feed: >> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/26973278-698fd9ee >> Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; >> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com >> > > *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/24379807-653794b5> | > Modify > <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> > Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com> > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
