Ah, the importance of semantic precision (still context-dependent, of course). ;-)
- Jef > -----Original Message----- > From: gts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 2:41 PM > To: agi@v2.listbox.com > Subject: Re: [agi] Betting and multiple-component truth values > > My last post wasn't very clear, but rather than try to correct it, > here is > an example of what I meant using multiple statements... > > S1 "There is life on Mars." > S2 "There is intelligent life on Mars." > S3 "There is intelligent life on Mars and they know about > relativity." > > The following condition is satisfied if one is a coherent > probabilistic > reasoner: > > P(S1) > P(S2) > P(S3) > > Again, I hope such basic coherency is not outside the scope of what > is or > will be possible in AI. > > -gts > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- > This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email > To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: > http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303 ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
