Richard, Let's save both of us time and wait when somebody else read this Cognitive Science book and will come here to discuss it. :-)
Though interesting, interpreting "Brain damage" experiments is not the most important thing for AGI development. >> In both cases vision module works good. >> Vision-to-identification works fine in both cases. >> >> In this case identified object cannot produce proper actions, because >> connection with action module was damaged. >> >> In another case identified object cannot be resolved into language >> concept, because connection with language module was damaged. >> >> Agree? > I don't think this works, unfortunately, because that was the first > simple explanation that people came up with, and it did not match up > with the data at all. I confess I do not have time to look this up > right now. You wouldn't be able to read one of the latest cognitive > neuropsychology books (not cognitive neuroscience, note) and let me know > would you? ;-) ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=73890290-7fa0bf
