No Mike. AGI must be able to discover regularities of all kind in all domains. If you can find a single domain where your AGI fails, it is no AGI.
Chess is broad and narrow at the same time. It is easy programmable and testable and humans can solve problems of this domain using abilities which are essential for AGI. Thus chess is a good milestone. Of course it is not sufficient for AGI. But before you think about sufficient features, necessary abilities are good milestones to verify whether your roadmap towards AGI will not go into a dead-end after a long way of vague hope, that future embodied experience will solve your problems which you cannot solve today. - Matthias Mike wrote P.S. Matthias seems to be cheerfully cutting his own throat here. The idea of a single domain AGI or pre-AGI is a contradiction in terms every which way - not just in terms of domains/subjects or fields, but also sensory domains. ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=117534816-b15a34 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
