On 11/16/23 22:02, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> On 11/16/23 22:02, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> [Oops we forgot to get Royal Assent last time.]
>>
>> I issue a Cabinet Order of Manifesto, distributing the proposal in the
>> Proposal Pool with title "Celebration!" that I most recently submitted,
>> removing it from the Proposal Pool and initiating a referendum on it.
>> For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 3,
>> the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid options are FOR and
>> AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are conditional votes).
>>
>> For this proposal, the class is Democratic. Other attributes of the
>> proposal are as follows:
>>
>> Title: Celebration!
>> Author: Janet
>> Coauthors:
>> Adoption index: 3.0
>>
>> {
>>
>> Enact a new Rule with power 3, title "Dictatorship", and text as follows:
>> {
>> Janet, acting as emself, CAN proclaim by announcement, specifying a
>> published document as being the Decree. When e does so, the Decree's
>> power is set to the power of this rule, then it takes effect, then its
>> power is set to 0.
>>
>> When a Decree takes effect, the Decree applies the changes
>> that it specifies in its text, except as prohibited by other
>> rules. Unless otherwise specified by the text, the effects are
>> applied in the order they appear in the text. Clearly marked
>> comments are ignored. If the Decree cannot make some changes it
>> specifies, that does not preclude the other changes from taking
>> place.
>>
>> A document CANNOT become a Decree except as specified in this Rule. A
>> Decree CANNOT take effect except as specified in this Rule.
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
> On the above decision I vote FOR.
>*sigh* On the above-initiated I vote FOR. (Probably this fails since I already did so but I continue to be paranoid.) -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
