On 11/16/23 22:03, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> On 11/16/23 22:02, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> On 11/16/23 22:02, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>>> [Oops we forgot to get Royal Assent last time.]
>>>
>>> I issue a Cabinet Order of Manifesto, distributing the proposal in the
>>> Proposal Pool with title "Celebration!" that I most recently submitted,
>>> removing it from the Proposal Pool and initiating a referendum on it.
>>> For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 3,
>>> the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid options are FOR and
>>> AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are conditional votes).
>>>
>>> For this proposal, the class is Democratic. Other attributes of the
>>> proposal are as follows:
>>>
>>> Title: Celebration!
>>> Author: Janet
>>> Coauthors:
>>> Adoption index: 3.0
>>>
>>> {
>>>
>>> Enact a new Rule with power 3, title "Dictatorship", and text as follows:
>>> {
>>> Janet, acting as emself, CAN proclaim by announcement, specifying a
>>> published document as being the Decree. When e does so, the Decree's
>>> power is set to the power of this rule, then it takes effect, then its
>>> power is set to 0.
>>>
>>> When a Decree takes effect, the Decree applies the changes
>>> that it specifies in its text, except as prohibited by other
>>> rules. Unless otherwise specified by the text, the effects are
>>> applied in the order they appear in the text. Clearly marked
>>> comments are ignored. If the Decree cannot make some changes it
>>> specifies, that does not preclude the other changes from taking
>>> place.
>>>
>>> A document CANNOT become a Decree except as specified in this Rule. A
>>> Decree CANNOT take effect except as specified in this Rule.
>>> }
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>> On the above decision I vote FOR.
>>
> *sigh*
>
> On the above-initiated I vote FOR. (Probably this fails since I already
> did so but I continue to be paranoid.)
>

*sigh* *sigh*

On the above-initiated *decision* I vote FOR. (Probably this fails as
before.)

-- 
Janet Cobb

Assessor, Rulekeepor, S​tonemason

Reply via email to