On Thu, 2023-11-16 at 22:02 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote: > [Oops we forgot to get Royal Assent last time.] > > I issue a Cabinet Order of Manifesto, distributing the proposal in the > Proposal Pool with title "Celebration!" that I most recently submitted, > removing it from the Proposal Pool and initiating a referendum on it. > For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 3, > the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid options are FOR and > AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are conditional votes). > > For this proposal, the class is Democratic. Other attributes of the > proposal are as follows: > > Title: Celebration! > Author: Janet > Coauthors: > Adoption index: 3.0 > > { > > Enact a new Rule with power 3, title "Dictatorship", and text as follows: > { > Janet, acting as emself, CAN proclaim by announcement, specifying a > published document as being the Decree. When e does so, the Decree's > power is set to the power of this rule, then it takes effect, then its > power is set to 0. > > When a Decree takes effect, the Decree applies the changes > that it specifies in its text, except as prohibited by other > rules. Unless otherwise specified by the text, the effects are > applied in the order they appear in the text. Clearly marked > comments are ignored. If the Decree cannot make some changes it > specifies, that does not preclude the other changes from taking > place. > > A document CANNOT become a Decree except as specified in this Rule. A > Decree CANNOT take effect except as specified in this Rule. > } > > }
For each referendum initiated today, I vote AGAINST on that referendum. (If Janet has a way to force this through, I'd like to see it: sometimes a forcethrough attempt ends up passing just on natural votes, which is really boring compared to seeing a scam in action, and thus it's a lot more interesting to vote AGAINST rather than FOR when this sort of thing happens.) Not coincidentally, I reach for the Sabotage Stone. -- ais523