That’s what I thought, but it seems like a bit of an overreaction and I don’t
understand the third sentence.
----
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On May 26, 2017, at 3:52 PM, Josh T <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On my mail client, it's in reply to my motion to reconsider CFJ 3498 ("Every
> statement is ambiguous") with two support.
>
> 天火狐
>
> On 26 May 2017 at 15:45, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> What is this email in reference to?
> ----
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
> > On May 26, 2017, at 3:44 PM, CuddleBeam <cuddleb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I support this.
> >
> > I'm also pissed.
> >
> > The ability of Agora's system to append a certain value to a certain switch
> > DOES NOT change whether a certain separate reality is factual or not. It's
> > absurdity.
> >
>
>
