Sorry for not specifying in the text itself, but this is relevant to gameplay because Gaelan (who, I believe is assigned this CFJ, numbered 3498, by ais523 [1]) is trying to question the validity of my amendment to the charter of 蘭亭社 with "Translation between any two languages is inherently ambiguous" as a premise.
天火狐 [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg07938.html On 21 May 2017 at 10:30, caleb vines <grokag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On May 21, 2017 9:16 AM, "Nic Evans" <nich...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I submit the following evidence and recommend AGAINST if DISMISS is not > accepted: > > -"Translation between any two languages is inherently ambiguous." is an > untrue statement. There is no such rule in language.-'Ambiguous' in the > rules refers to player interpretation, not some unknowable objective mark. > -Because ambiguity is determined case-by-case, it's impossible (and > fruitless) to make a statement about the ambiguity of every statement. > > I submit CFJs 3499 and 3500 as supporting evidence for this gratuitous > argument. >
