Gaelan Steele wrote:
I judge this as FALSE.Rule 1698/4: Agora is ossified if it is IMPOSSIBLE for any reasonable combination of actions by players to cause arbitrary rule changes to be made and/or arbitrary proposals to be adopted within a four-week period. If, but for this rule, the net effect of a proposal would cause Agora to become ossified, or would cause Agora to cease to exist, it cannot take effect, rules to the contrary notwithstanding. If any other single change to the gamestate would cause Agora to become ossified, or would cause Agora to cease to exist, it is cancelled and does not occur, rules to the contrary notwithstanding. Judging this as TRUE would cause Agora to become ossified (proposals are created by announcement, announcements must be unambiguous). Therefore, it is IMPOSSIBLE to judge this CFJ as TRUE. Therefore, I judge as FALSE.
More precisely, judging this as TRUE would imply that Agora is already ossified, which R1698 ought to have prevented. (Been catching up on e-mail backlog again, will probably finish tonight)
