On Thu, 17 Aug 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Thu, 2017-08-17 at 00:48 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > Per Rule 2166 (“Assets”), I indent, without objection, to destroy > > Agora, no sooner than August 20th 2017, 01:00, Eastern time. > > Just to make sure, I object. (We have several protections against > actions that make the game nonexistent or unplayable, so it's likely > that this couldn't succeed. It's possible, though, that destroying > Agora has an effect that doesn't make the nomic we're playing > unplayable. What does it mean to destroy a nomic anyway?)
Well, by common definition, if a nomic by its own rules was "destroyed", I'd say that instance of it would "cease to exist" and it would basically say "this nomic has ended, game over."
