On Thu, 17 Aug 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Thu, 2017-08-17 at 09:50 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Elevating R1698 sounds like a good idea though. One question is which > > of 1698, 1030, and 1551 should be highest - do their global protections > > interact in odd ways that mean we should be careful about their order? > > I've believed for a while that 1698 should be higher than 1030. 1030's > current 3.2 is probably correct, meaning that 1698 should be 3.3 (or 4 > if we have concerns over the Town Fountain somehow being used to end > the game).
Of course remembering that by amending R1030 you can completely flip the precedence order anyway :). Although if R1030 were changed to affect precedence order (e.g. reversing it so lower-powered rules have precedence), there would be hard-to-figure out conflicts with R2140. (Which might make things broken enough that R1698 would block the change from happening - so yes having R1698 higher would be good - but it's also potentially messy as it drags R2140 into the mix). -G.
