Indeed, if one is not willing to participate in the questionable practice of trading wins (I'll support your proposal to award yourself a win if you support mine), every win in nomics must involve some level of deceit, as one can't force a win, or offer anything less than a win for a win, as 'wins' are the most valuable 'asset'.
On 11/22/17, ATMunn <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, me neither, I don't like the idea of breaking the rules just to prevent > a win. A win is a win, and if someone wins because of a scam, so what? They > become the Speaker, and the game moves on. > > On 11/22/2017 3:44 PM, Alex Smith wrote: >> On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 20:39 +0000, Alexis Hunt wrote: >>> Ahh, hmm, I think that might work provided we can get a non-player to >>> call sufficient CFJs. Given the volume we couldn't do it with Shinies >>> alone. >> >> I can do 5, but am unwilling to violate the rules as part of a >> counterscam. (Also, I haven't thought of good topics for them yet.) >> >
