That's not true at all. Many meaningful win mechanics are as those in other games: the person who does best at something. For instance, we could decide to award a win to the player who votes on the most proposals in a month; no deceit is necessary for the competition.
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017, 17:29 Corona, <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Indeed, if one is not willing to participate in the questionable > practice of trading wins (I'll support your proposal to award yourself > a win if you support mine), every win in nomics must involve some > level of deceit, as one can't force a win, or offer anything less than > a win for a win, as 'wins' are the most valuable 'asset'. > > On 11/22/17, ATMunn <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, me neither, I don't like the idea of breaking the rules just to > prevent > > a win. A win is a win, and if someone wins because of a scam, so what? > They > > become the Speaker, and the game moves on. > > > > On 11/22/2017 3:44 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > >> On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 20:39 +0000, Alexis Hunt wrote: > >>> Ahh, hmm, I think that might work provided we can get a non-player to > >>> call sufficient CFJs. Given the volume we couldn't do it with Shinies > >>> alone. > >> > >> I can do 5, but am unwilling to violate the rules as part of a > >> counterscam. (Also, I haven't thought of good topics for them yet.) > >> > > >
