Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Ambassadorial Consideration

[Publius Scribonius Scholasticus]

Yes. That is my third strike. Now, Aris is the only remaining player,
assuming eir argument is ruled VALID and e thus wins.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 8:59 AM Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  > [...] with which Agora would establish relations.
>
> You mean G.A.N. Agora?
>
> ~Corona
>
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I submit the below argument on the third docket:
> >
> > Your Honor,
> >
> > I agree with My Fellow Counsellor, Aris, that the office of Ambassador
> > should be brought back. However, there remain many qvestion$ to
> > consider, even after making that determination. Initially, it must be
> > determined whether a separate Ambassador should be appointed for each
> > Nomic, with which Agora would establish relations. I believe that it
> > would be better to have a separate Ambassador for each Nomic, so that
> > each Ambassador would have a better knowledge of the foreign Nomic.
> > Additionally, I would propose that there be a Minister of Foreign
> > Affairs, who would determine general policy and serve as the
> > Ambassador to G.A.N. of F.R.C., in recognition of its special historic
> > status, discussed on the first docket.
> >