I agree about the short times as well. Sorry everyone. Now we just have to
see who wins on points...

If I would be appointed Speaker, I request that the appointment be deferred
until after the PM election.

-Aris

On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 9:42 AM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:

>
>
> Yah sorry about that, the first draft regs used original FRC timing which
> seemed far too long - holiday tournaments have sometimes worked best
> as blitz versions but this was too short, somewhere in the middle would
> have been best.
>
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Rebecca wrote:
> > damn time limits!!!!!! this would have been more fun with higher
> > participation/longer time but congrats aris.
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Yes. That is my third strike. Now, Aris is the only remaining player,
> > > assuming eir argument is ruled VALID and e thus wins.
> > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 8:59 AM Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>  > [...] with which Agora would establish relations.
> > >>
> > >> You mean G.A.N. Agora?
> > >>
> > >> ~Corona
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
> > >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I submit the below argument on the third docket:
> > >> >
> > >> > Your Honor,
> > >> >
> > >> > I agree with My Fellow Counsellor, Aris, that the office of
> Ambassador
> > >> > should be brought back. However, there remain many qvestion$ to
> > >> > consider, even after making that determination. Initially, it must
> be
> > >> > determined whether a separate Ambassador should be appointed for
> each
> > >> > Nomic, with which Agora would establish relations. I believe that it
> > >> > would be better to have a separate Ambassador for each Nomic, so
> that
> > >> > each Ambassador would have a better knowledge of the foreign Nomic.
> > >> > Additionally, I would propose that there be a Minister of Foreign
> > >> > Affairs, who would determine general policy and serve as the
> > >> > Ambassador to G.A.N. of F.R.C., in recognition of its special
> historic
> > >> > status, discussed on the first docket.
> > >> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > From V.J. Rada
> >
>
>

Reply via email to