I don't think that you get a win from the Birthday Tournament under
the current rules.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 2:52 PM Aris Merchant
<thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I agree about the short times as well. Sorry everyone. Now we just have to
> see who wins on points...
>
> If I would be appointed Speaker, I request that the appointment be deferred
> until after the PM election.
>
> -Aris
>
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 9:42 AM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Yah sorry about that, the first draft regs used original FRC timing which
> > seemed far too long - holiday tournaments have sometimes worked best
> > as blitz versions but this was too short, somewhere in the middle would
> > have been best.
> >
> > On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Rebecca wrote:
> > > damn time limits!!!!!! this would have been more fun with higher
> > > participation/longer time but congrats aris.
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> > > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Yes. That is my third strike. Now, Aris is the only remaining player,
> > > > assuming eir argument is ruled VALID and e thus wins.
> > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 8:59 AM Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>  > [...] with which Agora would establish relations.
> > > >>
> > > >> You mean G.A.N. Agora?
> > > >>
> > > >> ~Corona
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
> > > >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > I submit the below argument on the third docket:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Your Honor,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I agree with My Fellow Counsellor, Aris, that the office of
> > Ambassador
> > > >> > should be brought back. However, there remain many qvestion$ to
> > > >> > consider, even after making that determination. Initially, it must
> > be
> > > >> > determined whether a separate Ambassador should be appointed for
> > each
> > > >> > Nomic, with which Agora would establish relations. I believe that it
> > > >> > would be better to have a separate Ambassador for each Nomic, so
> > that
> > > >> > each Ambassador would have a better knowledge of the foreign Nomic.
> > > >> > Additionally, I would propose that there be a Minister of Foreign
> > > >> > Affairs, who would determine general policy and serve as the
> > > >> > Ambassador to G.A.N. of F.R.C., in recognition of its special
> > historic
> > > >> > status, discussed on the first docket.
> > > >> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > From V.J. Rada
> > >
> >
> >

Reply via email to