G., could you declare the winners, so that I may award the appropriate patent titles? On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 3:19 PM Aris Merchant <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It probably shouldn't have been. My thinking was that tournament is only > really supposed to last a few weeks (there's a SHOULD to that effect). If > it goes for three months, it's way overtime, perhaps because it's broken or > no one is interested enough to complete the goal condition. Under those > circumstances, I wanted it to stop automatically. The reason it shouldn't > have been included is that there still might be players enjoying the > tournament, and they can always terminate it by proposal. It's not actually > a bug, and we can always fix it if it ever becomes a problem. > > -Aris > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:06 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Oh, I missed that rule. One question: Why was the 3-month time limit > > included? > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 3:00 PM Aris Merchant > > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > R2464, "Tournaments": "If a winner of a tournament is determined within > > > within 3 months of its initiation, that person or persons win the game, > > > otherwise the tournament concludes with no winner." > > > > > > Who do you think wrote the latest version of the tournament rules. :) > > > > > > -Aris > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:55 AM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > > > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I don't think that you get a win from the Birthday Tournament under > > > > the current rules. > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 2:52 PM Aris Merchant > > > > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I agree about the short times as well. Sorry everyone. Now we just > > have > > > > to > > > > > see who wins on points... > > > > > > > > > > If I would be appointed Speaker, I request that the appointment be > > > > deferred > > > > > until after the PM election. > > > > > > > > > > -Aris > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 9:42 AM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yah sorry about that, the first draft regs used original FRC timing > > > > which > > > > > > seemed far too long - holiday tournaments have sometimes worked > > best > > > > > > as blitz versions but this was too short, somewhere in the middle > > would > > > > > > have been best. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, Rebecca wrote: > > > > > > > damn time limits!!!!!! this would have been more fun with higher > > > > > > > participation/longer time but congrats aris. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 11:05 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > > > > > > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Yes. That is my third strike. Now, Aris is the only remaining > > > > player, > > > > > > > > assuming eir argument is ruled VALID and e thus wins. > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 8:59 AM Corona < > > > > liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > [...] with which Agora would establish relations. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> You mean G.A.N. Agora? > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> ~Corona > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Publius Scribonius > > Scholasticus < > > > > > > > >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > I submit the below argument on the third docket: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > Your Honor, > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > I agree with My Fellow Counsellor, Aris, that the office of > > > > > > Ambassador > > > > > > > >> > should be brought back. However, there remain many > > qvestion$ to > > > > > > > >> > consider, even after making that determination. Initially, > > it > > > > must > > > > > > be > > > > > > > >> > determined whether a separate Ambassador should be > > appointed for > > > > > > each > > > > > > > >> > Nomic, with which Agora would establish relations. I believe > > > > that it > > > > > > > >> > would be better to have a separate Ambassador for each > > Nomic, so > > > > > > that > > > > > > > >> > each Ambassador would have a better knowledge of the foreign > > > > Nomic. > > > > > > > >> > Additionally, I would propose that there be a Minister of > > > > Foreign > > > > > > > >> > Affairs, who would determine general policy and serve as the > > > > > > > >> > Ambassador to G.A.N. of F.R.C., in recognition of its > > special > > > > > > historic > > > > > > > >> > status, discussed on the first docket. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > From V.J. Rada > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Ambassadorial Consideration
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus Sun, 15 Jul 2018 15:52:26 -0700
- DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Ambassadorial Consi... Corona
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Ambassador... Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Ambass... Rebecca
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] An Am... Kerim Aydin
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [FRC] A... Aris Merchant
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [F... Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS... Aris Merchant
- Re: DIS: Re:... Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
- Re: DIS: Re:... Aris Merchant
- Re: DIS: Re:... Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
- Re: DIS: Re:... Kerim Aydin