NttPF.

On the merits, accepted, with my sincere apologies. I could patch this
by submitting a revised distribution now, but then the proposal might
not reach quorum (quorum is 7 ATM, which is pretty high, and people
tend to forget to vote on special distributions). Or I could wait and
put it in the next distribution. Neither is a great option, and I'm
sorry to put you in this situation. I'll do whichever you prefer as
proposal author.

-Aris

On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 7:09 PM Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Claim of error: I submitted the proposal "Regulated actions reform (v2)"
> here [0].
>
>
> [0]:
> https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2019-June/040719.html
>
>
> Jason Cobb
>
> On 7/1/19 9:55 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
> > Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
> > pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
> > quorum is 7, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid
> > options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are
> > conditional votes).
> >
> > ID    Author(s)              AI    Title
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 8196  Jason Cobb, Falsifian  1.7   Perfecting pledges (v1.2)
> > 8197  G.                     none  no power is all powerful
> > 8198  Jason Cobb             1.0   Be gone, foul demon!
> > 8199  Jason Cobb             3.0   Fixing instant runoff
> > 8200  Aris, G.               3.0   Sane AI Defaulting
> > 8201  Aris                   3.0   Just Make Them Write It Out
> >
> >
> > The proposal pool is currently empty.
> >
> > The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below.
> >
> > //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> > ID: 8196
> > Title: Perfecting pledges (v1.2)
> > Adoption index: 1.7
> > Author: Jason Cobb
> > Co-authors: Falsifian
> >
> >
> > [Comment: This clarifies the wording to explicitly use both the time
> > window and penalty specified in the Oath. This also specifies that
> > pledges can only be violated once.]
> >
> > Amend the first paragraph of Rule 2450 ("Pledges") to read:
> >
> >    If a Player makes a clear public pledge (syn. Oath) to perform (or
> >    refrain from performing) certain actions, then breaking the pledge
> >    within the pledge's time window is the Class N crime of
> >    Oathbreaking. If the pledge specifically states that the pledge is
> >    under penalty of a Class A crime, where A is an integer not less
> >    than 1, then N is A; otherwise, N is 2. If the pledge specifically
> >    states that it operates only for a certain time window, and if that
> >    time window is prospective and not retrospective, then it operates
> >    only for that time window; otherwise, the pledge operates for 60
> >    days. It is impossible to commit the crime of Oathbreaking multiple
> >    times for a single pledge; breaking a single pledge multiple times
> >    constitutes a single crime.
> >
> > //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> > ID: 8197
> > Title: no power is all powerful
> > Adoption index: none
> > Author: G.
> > Co-authors:
> >
> >
> > Create the following Rule, "Supreme Power", Power=4:
> >
> >    G. CAN make arbitrary changes to the gamestate by announcement.
> >
> > //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> > ID: 8198
> > Title: Be gone, foul demon!
> > Adoption index: 1.0
> > Author: Jason Cobb
> > Co-authors:
> >
> >
> > Repeal Rule 2596 ("The Ritual").
> >
> > //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> > ID: 8199
> > Title: Fixing instant runoff
> > Adoption index: 3.0
> > Author: Jason Cobb
> > Co-authors:
> >
> >
> > Amend item 3 of the only list of Rule 2528 ("Voting Methods") to read:
> >
> >    3. For an instant runoff decision, non-empty ordered lists for which
> >    each element is a valid option.
> >
> > //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> > ID: 8200
> > Title: Sane AI Defaulting
> > Adoption index: 3.0
> > Author: Aris
> > Co-authors: G.
> >
> >
> > Amend Rule 1950 (Decisions with Adoption Indices) by replacing:
> >    Adoption index is an untracked switch possessed by Agoran
> >    decisions and proposals, whose value is either "none" (default) or
> >    an integral multiple of 0.1 from 1.0 to 9.9.
> > with:
> >    Adoption index (AI) is an untracked switch possessed by Agoran
> >    decisions and proposals.  For decisions, the possible values are
> >    "none" (default) or integral multiples of 0.1 from 1.0 to 9.9.
> >    For proposals, the possible values are integral multiples of 0.1
> >    from 1.0 to 9.9 (default 1.0).
> >
> > //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> > ID: 8201
> > Title: Just Make Them Write It Out
> > Adoption index: 3.0
> > Author: Aris
> > Co-authors:
> >
> >
> > [It's terribly confusing for everyone to leave out a proposal title. Leaving
> > out AI only works if it's 1.0 anyway, and confuses me every time I see it.
> > I usually spend like a solid minute checking that I haven't missed something
> > as Promotor and that the proposal is effective at that power as a player.
> > Just making these fields mandatory would save everyone so much trouble and
> > be only marginally more work for authors.]
> >
> > Amend Rule 2350, "Proposals", by changing the first paragraph, including
> > the following list, to read in full:
> >
> >    A proposal is an entity consisting of a body of text and
> >    other attributes. A player CAN create a proposal by announcement,
> >    specifying its text, an associated title, and a valid adoption index, and
> >    optionally specifying a list of co-authors (who must be persons other
> >    than the author).
> >
> > //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Reply via email to