The link I pasted was (my attempt at) sending it to the public forum. Is replying and setting the to address to agora-business not enough?

Jason Cobb

On 7/1/19 10:55 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
Roger on the proposal, and again, I'm sorry. It's your CoE that's NttPF.

-Aris

On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 7:52 PM Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
It's fine. It's not urgent in light of the judgment on CFJ 3737, so it
can just wait. Also, it was submitted to the public forum here [0].

[0]:
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2019-July/040745.html

Jason Cobb

On 7/1/19 10:48 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
NttPF.

On the merits, accepted, with my sincere apologies. I could patch this
by submitting a revised distribution now, but then the proposal might
not reach quorum (quorum is 7 ATM, which is pretty high, and people
tend to forget to vote on special distributions). Or I could wait and
put it in the next distribution. Neither is a great option, and I'm
sorry to put you in this situation. I'll do whichever you prefer as
proposal author.

-Aris

On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 7:09 PM Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
Claim of error: I submitted the proposal "Regulated actions reform (v2)"
here [0].


[0]:
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2019-June/040719.html


Jason Cobb

On 7/1/19 9:55 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the
quorum is 7, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid
options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are
conditional votes).

ID    Author(s)              AI    Title
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
8196  Jason Cobb, Falsifian  1.7   Perfecting pledges (v1.2)
8197  G.                     none  no power is all powerful
8198  Jason Cobb             1.0   Be gone, foul demon!
8199  Jason Cobb             3.0   Fixing instant runoff
8200  Aris, G.               3.0   Sane AI Defaulting
8201  Aris                   3.0   Just Make Them Write It Out


The proposal pool is currently empty.

The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8196
Title: Perfecting pledges (v1.2)
Adoption index: 1.7
Author: Jason Cobb
Co-authors: Falsifian


[Comment: This clarifies the wording to explicitly use both the time
window and penalty specified in the Oath. This also specifies that
pledges can only be violated once.]

Amend the first paragraph of Rule 2450 ("Pledges") to read:

     If a Player makes a clear public pledge (syn. Oath) to perform (or
     refrain from performing) certain actions, then breaking the pledge
     within the pledge's time window is the Class N crime of
     Oathbreaking. If the pledge specifically states that the pledge is
     under penalty of a Class A crime, where A is an integer not less
     than 1, then N is A; otherwise, N is 2. If the pledge specifically
     states that it operates only for a certain time window, and if that
     time window is prospective and not retrospective, then it operates
     only for that time window; otherwise, the pledge operates for 60
     days. It is impossible to commit the crime of Oathbreaking multiple
     times for a single pledge; breaking a single pledge multiple times
     constitutes a single crime.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8197
Title: no power is all powerful
Adoption index: none
Author: G.
Co-authors:


Create the following Rule, "Supreme Power", Power=4:

     G. CAN make arbitrary changes to the gamestate by announcement.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8198
Title: Be gone, foul demon!
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: Jason Cobb
Co-authors:


Repeal Rule 2596 ("The Ritual").

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8199
Title: Fixing instant runoff
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Jason Cobb
Co-authors:


Amend item 3 of the only list of Rule 2528 ("Voting Methods") to read:

     3. For an instant runoff decision, non-empty ordered lists for which
     each element is a valid option.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8200
Title: Sane AI Defaulting
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Aris
Co-authors: G.


Amend Rule 1950 (Decisions with Adoption Indices) by replacing:
     Adoption index is an untracked switch possessed by Agoran
     decisions and proposals, whose value is either "none" (default) or
     an integral multiple of 0.1 from 1.0 to 9.9.
with:
     Adoption index (AI) is an untracked switch possessed by Agoran
     decisions and proposals.  For decisions, the possible values are
     "none" (default) or integral multiples of 0.1 from 1.0 to 9.9.
     For proposals, the possible values are integral multiples of 0.1
     from 1.0 to 9.9 (default 1.0).

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8201
Title: Just Make Them Write It Out
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Aris
Co-authors:


[It's terribly confusing for everyone to leave out a proposal title. Leaving
out AI only works if it's 1.0 anyway, and confuses me every time I see it.
I usually spend like a solid minute checking that I haven't missed something
as Promotor and that the proposal is effective at that power as a player.
Just making these fields mandatory would save everyone so much trouble and
be only marginally more work for authors.]

Amend Rule 2350, "Proposals", by changing the first paragraph, including
the following list, to read in full:

     A proposal is an entity consisting of a body of text and
     other attributes. A player CAN create a proposal by announcement,
     specifying its text, an associated title, and a valid adoption index, and
     optionally specifying a list of co-authors (who must be persons other
     than the author).

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Reply via email to