These aren't real CoEs anyway, remember. There's no obligation for proposals to be distributed at the same time. So you can't really CoE an omission, only finger point an untimely one.
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:00 PM Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > *OH.* Whoops. Yeah, it's good. For some reason (maybe because the > number was the same? my error in any case) I was sure that the link > was the same as in your previous email; it definitely wasn't though. > Yeah, your CoE totally worked. > > -Aris > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 7:58 PM Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The link I pasted was (my attempt at) sending it to the public forum. Is > > replying and setting the to address to agora-business not enough? > > > > Jason Cobb > > > > On 7/1/19 10:55 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > > > Roger on the proposal, and again, I'm sorry. It's your CoE that's > NttPF. > > > > > > -Aris > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 7:52 PM Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >> It's fine. It's not urgent in light of the judgment on CFJ 3737, so it > > >> can just wait. Also, it was submitted to the public forum here [0]. > > >> > > >> [0]: > > >> > https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2019-July/040745.html > > >> > > >> Jason Cobb > > >> > > >> On 7/1/19 10:48 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > > >>> NttPF. > > >>> > > >>> On the merits, accepted, with my sincere apologies. I could patch > this > > >>> by submitting a revised distribution now, but then the proposal might > > >>> not reach quorum (quorum is 7 ATM, which is pretty high, and people > > >>> tend to forget to vote on special distributions). Or I could wait and > > >>> put it in the next distribution. Neither is a great option, and I'm > > >>> sorry to put you in this situation. I'll do whichever you prefer as > > >>> proposal author. > > >>> > > >>> -Aris > > >>> > > >>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 7:09 PM Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >>>> Claim of error: I submitted the proposal "Regulated actions reform > (v2)" > > >>>> here [0]. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> [0]: > > >>>> > https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2019-June/040719.html > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Jason Cobb > > >>>> > > >>>> On 7/1/19 9:55 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > > >>>>> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > > >>>>> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal > > >>>>> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the > > >>>>> quorum is 7, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid > > >>>>> options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are > > >>>>> conditional votes). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> ID Author(s) AI Title > > >>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>> 8196 Jason Cobb, Falsifian 1.7 Perfecting pledges (v1.2) > > >>>>> 8197 G. none no power is all powerful > > >>>>> 8198 Jason Cobb 1.0 Be gone, foul demon! > > >>>>> 8199 Jason Cobb 3.0 Fixing instant runoff > > >>>>> 8200 Aris, G. 3.0 Sane AI Defaulting > > >>>>> 8201 Aris 3.0 Just Make Them Write It Out > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The proposal pool is currently empty. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > >>>>> ID: 8196 > > >>>>> Title: Perfecting pledges (v1.2) > > >>>>> Adoption index: 1.7 > > >>>>> Author: Jason Cobb > > >>>>> Co-authors: Falsifian > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> [Comment: This clarifies the wording to explicitly use both the > time > > >>>>> window and penalty specified in the Oath. This also specifies that > > >>>>> pledges can only be violated once.] > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Amend the first paragraph of Rule 2450 ("Pledges") to read: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> If a Player makes a clear public pledge (syn. Oath) to > perform (or > > >>>>> refrain from performing) certain actions, then breaking the > pledge > > >>>>> within the pledge's time window is the Class N crime of > > >>>>> Oathbreaking. If the pledge specifically states that the > pledge is > > >>>>> under penalty of a Class A crime, where A is an integer not > less > > >>>>> than 1, then N is A; otherwise, N is 2. If the pledge > specifically > > >>>>> states that it operates only for a certain time window, and > if that > > >>>>> time window is prospective and not retrospective, then it > operates > > >>>>> only for that time window; otherwise, the pledge operates for > 60 > > >>>>> days. It is impossible to commit the crime of Oathbreaking > multiple > > >>>>> times for a single pledge; breaking a single pledge multiple > times > > >>>>> constitutes a single crime. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > >>>>> ID: 8197 > > >>>>> Title: no power is all powerful > > >>>>> Adoption index: none > > >>>>> Author: G. > > >>>>> Co-authors: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Create the following Rule, "Supreme Power", Power=4: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> G. CAN make arbitrary changes to the gamestate by > announcement. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > >>>>> ID: 8198 > > >>>>> Title: Be gone, foul demon! > > >>>>> Adoption index: 1.0 > > >>>>> Author: Jason Cobb > > >>>>> Co-authors: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Repeal Rule 2596 ("The Ritual"). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > >>>>> ID: 8199 > > >>>>> Title: Fixing instant runoff > > >>>>> Adoption index: 3.0 > > >>>>> Author: Jason Cobb > > >>>>> Co-authors: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Amend item 3 of the only list of Rule 2528 ("Voting Methods") to > read: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 3. For an instant runoff decision, non-empty ordered lists > for which > > >>>>> each element is a valid option. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > >>>>> ID: 8200 > > >>>>> Title: Sane AI Defaulting > > >>>>> Adoption index: 3.0 > > >>>>> Author: Aris > > >>>>> Co-authors: G. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Amend Rule 1950 (Decisions with Adoption Indices) by replacing: > > >>>>> Adoption index is an untracked switch possessed by Agoran > > >>>>> decisions and proposals, whose value is either "none" > (default) or > > >>>>> an integral multiple of 0.1 from 1.0 to 9.9. > > >>>>> with: > > >>>>> Adoption index (AI) is an untracked switch possessed by Agoran > > >>>>> decisions and proposals. For decisions, the possible values > are > > >>>>> "none" (default) or integral multiples of 0.1 from 1.0 to 9.9. > > >>>>> For proposals, the possible values are integral multiples of > 0.1 > > >>>>> from 1.0 to 9.9 (default 1.0). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > >>>>> ID: 8201 > > >>>>> Title: Just Make Them Write It Out > > >>>>> Adoption index: 3.0 > > >>>>> Author: Aris > > >>>>> Co-authors: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> [It's terribly confusing for everyone to leave out a proposal > title. Leaving > > >>>>> out AI only works if it's 1.0 anyway, and confuses me every time I > see it. > > >>>>> I usually spend like a solid minute checking that I haven't missed > something > > >>>>> as Promotor and that the proposal is effective at that power as a > player. > > >>>>> Just making these fields mandatory would save everyone so much > trouble and > > >>>>> be only marginally more work for authors.] > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Amend Rule 2350, "Proposals", by changing the first paragraph, > including > > >>>>> the following list, to read in full: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> A proposal is an entity consisting of a body of text and > > >>>>> other attributes. A player CAN create a proposal by > announcement, > > >>>>> specifying its text, an associated title, and a valid > adoption index, and > > >>>>> optionally specifying a list of co-authors (who must be > persons other > > >>>>> than the author). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > -- >From R. Lee
