Roger on the proposal, and again, I'm sorry. It's your CoE that's NttPF. -Aris
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 7:52 PM Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It's fine. It's not urgent in light of the judgment on CFJ 3737, so it > can just wait. Also, it was submitted to the public forum here [0]. > > [0]: > https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2019-July/040745.html > > Jason Cobb > > On 7/1/19 10:48 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > > NttPF. > > > > On the merits, accepted, with my sincere apologies. I could patch this > > by submitting a revised distribution now, but then the proposal might > > not reach quorum (quorum is 7 ATM, which is pretty high, and people > > tend to forget to vote on special distributions). Or I could wait and > > put it in the next distribution. Neither is a great option, and I'm > > sorry to put you in this situation. I'll do whichever you prefer as > > proposal author. > > > > -Aris > > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 7:09 PM Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Claim of error: I submitted the proposal "Regulated actions reform (v2)" > >> here [0]. > >> > >> > >> [0]: > >> https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2019-June/040719.html > >> > >> > >> Jason Cobb > >> > >> On 7/1/19 9:55 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > >>> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran > >>> Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal > >>> pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the > >>> quorum is 7, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid > >>> options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are > >>> conditional votes). > >>> > >>> ID Author(s) AI Title > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> 8196 Jason Cobb, Falsifian 1.7 Perfecting pledges (v1.2) > >>> 8197 G. none no power is all powerful > >>> 8198 Jason Cobb 1.0 Be gone, foul demon! > >>> 8199 Jason Cobb 3.0 Fixing instant runoff > >>> 8200 Aris, G. 3.0 Sane AI Defaulting > >>> 8201 Aris 3.0 Just Make Them Write It Out > >>> > >>> > >>> The proposal pool is currently empty. > >>> > >>> The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. > >>> > >>> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > >>> ID: 8196 > >>> Title: Perfecting pledges (v1.2) > >>> Adoption index: 1.7 > >>> Author: Jason Cobb > >>> Co-authors: Falsifian > >>> > >>> > >>> [Comment: This clarifies the wording to explicitly use both the time > >>> window and penalty specified in the Oath. This also specifies that > >>> pledges can only be violated once.] > >>> > >>> Amend the first paragraph of Rule 2450 ("Pledges") to read: > >>> > >>> If a Player makes a clear public pledge (syn. Oath) to perform (or > >>> refrain from performing) certain actions, then breaking the pledge > >>> within the pledge's time window is the Class N crime of > >>> Oathbreaking. If the pledge specifically states that the pledge is > >>> under penalty of a Class A crime, where A is an integer not less > >>> than 1, then N is A; otherwise, N is 2. If the pledge specifically > >>> states that it operates only for a certain time window, and if that > >>> time window is prospective and not retrospective, then it operates > >>> only for that time window; otherwise, the pledge operates for 60 > >>> days. It is impossible to commit the crime of Oathbreaking multiple > >>> times for a single pledge; breaking a single pledge multiple times > >>> constitutes a single crime. > >>> > >>> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > >>> ID: 8197 > >>> Title: no power is all powerful > >>> Adoption index: none > >>> Author: G. > >>> Co-authors: > >>> > >>> > >>> Create the following Rule, "Supreme Power", Power=4: > >>> > >>> G. CAN make arbitrary changes to the gamestate by announcement. > >>> > >>> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > >>> ID: 8198 > >>> Title: Be gone, foul demon! > >>> Adoption index: 1.0 > >>> Author: Jason Cobb > >>> Co-authors: > >>> > >>> > >>> Repeal Rule 2596 ("The Ritual"). > >>> > >>> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > >>> ID: 8199 > >>> Title: Fixing instant runoff > >>> Adoption index: 3.0 > >>> Author: Jason Cobb > >>> Co-authors: > >>> > >>> > >>> Amend item 3 of the only list of Rule 2528 ("Voting Methods") to read: > >>> > >>> 3. For an instant runoff decision, non-empty ordered lists for which > >>> each element is a valid option. > >>> > >>> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > >>> ID: 8200 > >>> Title: Sane AI Defaulting > >>> Adoption index: 3.0 > >>> Author: Aris > >>> Co-authors: G. > >>> > >>> > >>> Amend Rule 1950 (Decisions with Adoption Indices) by replacing: > >>> Adoption index is an untracked switch possessed by Agoran > >>> decisions and proposals, whose value is either "none" (default) or > >>> an integral multiple of 0.1 from 1.0 to 9.9. > >>> with: > >>> Adoption index (AI) is an untracked switch possessed by Agoran > >>> decisions and proposals. For decisions, the possible values are > >>> "none" (default) or integral multiples of 0.1 from 1.0 to 9.9. > >>> For proposals, the possible values are integral multiples of 0.1 > >>> from 1.0 to 9.9 (default 1.0). > >>> > >>> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > >>> ID: 8201 > >>> Title: Just Make Them Write It Out > >>> Adoption index: 3.0 > >>> Author: Aris > >>> Co-authors: > >>> > >>> > >>> [It's terribly confusing for everyone to leave out a proposal title. > >>> Leaving > >>> out AI only works if it's 1.0 anyway, and confuses me every time I see it. > >>> I usually spend like a solid minute checking that I haven't missed > >>> something > >>> as Promotor and that the proposal is effective at that power as a player. > >>> Just making these fields mandatory would save everyone so much trouble and > >>> be only marginally more work for authors.] > >>> > >>> Amend Rule 2350, "Proposals", by changing the first paragraph, including > >>> the following list, to read in full: > >>> > >>> A proposal is an entity consisting of a body of text and > >>> other attributes. A player CAN create a proposal by announcement, > >>> specifying its text, an associated title, and a valid adoption index, > >>> and > >>> optionally specifying a list of co-authors (who must be persons other > >>> than the author). > >>> > >>> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
