Sounds even better. On Jun 3, 2009, at 4:13 AM, Sebastian Kiesel wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 09:39:55PM -0400, Eric Burger wrote:Inline. On Jun 2, 2009, at 11:05 AM, Linda Dunbar wrote:More important: thanks for the review! The document went through quite aEric,Thank you very much for the explanation. Since I haven't participatedin the ALTO discussion until recently, I am not aware that working group has already reached consensus on the document. Seeing thedocument is only at its Version 1, I thought the document is still atits early stage and open for input.few revisions at the draft-marocco stage.Both (either a new figure or the disclaimer text) works for me. Any oneI will take you suggestion on trying to draw a "better picture" and submit to the working group for review. If no better picture can be agreed by the working group, I would like to take your offer on putting the following words into the document: Figure 1 is only representative of the situation and, in particular, does NOT enumerate any particular or favored implementation strategyelse in the group have thoughts?I think the current figure is adequate (but looking forward to see a proposal for a better one). regarding the caption/disclaimer: I think that although there are lots of approaches for dealing with the ALTO problem, the figure was notchosen randomly and coincidences with actual protocol proposals are notcompletely unintentional. maybe something like: Figure 1 illustrates the situation and components for one of several possible high-level solution approaches for dealing with the ALTO problem, namely the one which the ALTO WG has agreed to work on and which is reflected in the ALTO WG charter. (hoping that the "illustrates" gives enough hints that this figure is not normative and does not mandate that there must be a single ALTO server implemented as a physical box, etc.) Thanks, Sebastian -- Sebastian Kiesel mailto:sebastian.kie...@nw.neclab.euNetwork Research Division tel:+49-6221-4342-232 fax: +49-6221-4342-155 NEC Laboratories Europe Kurfuerstenanlage 36, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany-- NEC Europe Limited Registered in England 2832014 Registered Office NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto