Jordi, Your draft describes two aspects of the service performance impacted by the Computing: Service Deployment and Service (Path) Selection. Those two should be separated, as the Service Deployment belongs to the OpsArea, and the Service selection (including Network Path & DCs that host the services) belongs to the Routing area.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-5g-edge-service-metadata/ has proposed a new Metadata Path Attribute and some Sub-TLVs for egress routers to advertise the Metadata about the attached edge services (ES). The Edge Service Metadata can be used by the ingress routers in the 5G Local Data Network to make path selections not only based on the routing cost but also the running environment of the edge services. The goal is to improve latency and performance for 5G edge services. Can this Metadata Path Attribute address the problem stated in your draft? I CC'ed the IDR WG, so your comments on the Path Selection can be visible to them. Thanks, Linda From: Cats <cats-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Jordi Ros Giralt Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 6:47 AM To: c...@ietf.org; alto@ietf.org Subject: [Cats] New draft on joint exposure of network and compute information Dear CATS and ALTO WG mailing list members, We submitted a new draft on joint exposure of network and compute information for service placement and selection: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rcr-opsawg-operational-compute-metrics/ Joint Exposure of Network and Compute Information for Infrastructure-Aware Service DeploymentJoint Exposure of Network and Compute Information for Infrastructure-Aware Service Deployment This draft focuses on the problem of exposing both network and compute information to the service provider/application to support service placement and selection decisions. ALTO provides an interface for network information exposure to the service provider/application; thus, an approach is to leverage and extend it with compute metrics. CATS also needs to develop compute metrics to support traffic steering decisions. The common ground is in these compute metrics, which could be reused across the various use cases (e.g., consumed by the network as in CATS or consumed by the application as in ALTO). This draft also aims at providing a framework for continuing the discussion initiated during IETF 117 regarding the presentation "Compute-aware metrics: CATS working with ALTO": https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/slides-117-alto-compute-aware-metrics-cats-working-with-alto/ We would like to seek feedback from both working groups on developing compute metrics that can be reused for different use cases, to avoid duplicated work and increase the effectiveness of future standards. Thanks, Jordi
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
