Gene Heskett gheskett-at-wdtv.com |amusersj-ml0| wrote at 15:07 -0400 on Jul 
18, 2014:
 > On Friday 18 July 2014 14:22:48 John Hein did opine
 > And Gene did reply:
 > > Gene Heskett wrote at 12:25 -0400 on Jul 18, 2014:
 > >  > 14/7/18@12:09:37: ERROR: 3859 {activate_normal} bind failed (Address
 > >  > already in use (errno = 98)). service = amanda
 > >
 > > More than one xinetd or inetd running?
 > >
 > > Maybe some basic background is in order.  The basic operation of
 > > *inetd is pretty simple, and if you understand the basics, you can
 > > really solve many of the common issues yourself.
 > >
 > > *inetd runs forever "listening" on the sockets you tell it to
 > > listen on (as configured by the xinetd or inetd config files).
 > > When requests (any activity) on that socket come in, it tries
 > > to run the service that is specified in its configuration.
 > >
 > > If something else "owns" that socket, *inetd can't do its job
 > > (i.e., can't start the service corresponds to that socket).
 > >
 > > If not, then *inetd will spawn off the configured service (amandad
 > > in amanda's case).
 > >
 > > Technically, you don't need *inetd.  You can kick off amandad to run
 > > on the client some other way (e.g., daemontools, ssh).  But the server
 > > expects something to be listening on the client when it comes time to
 > > do the dump.
 > >
 > > As others have mentioned, you have to configure things for the right
 > > type of socket - the configuration of the amanda server (primarily
 > > in amanda.conf / disklist) and client (typically inetd config and
 > > amanda-client.conf) should match (see amanda-auth(7) and
 > > amanda-client.conf(5)).
 > >
 > > Here's some other good info so you can maybe help yourself and
 > > understand better how things work:
 > >
 > > http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Quick_start_%28old%29
 >
 > I just discovered that the failing box did NOT have an /etc/amanda-
 > client.conf, so I copied the one from examples and edited it.  But the
 > working machine doesn't have one either, so I nuked it. amcheck didn't
 > care.

You got that out of my email?

What about the most important bits:

two inetd's running?
and the bind failure?

And the hint to use the background info to try digging on your own a
little.  You're doing lots of things and it seems you don't know why -
just guessing.  That's never a good recipe.

Your xinetd got a bind failure.  That has nothing to do with amanda.
Fix that first.

Reply via email to