Clegg Intercepter receiver for 6 and 2 meters also used the 7360 as a mixer. In my Squires Sanders SS-1R receiver, with no signals present and the antenna connected, the receiver is very quiet. It comes to life when you tune a signal. The receiver was not very tolerant of random length antennas or antennas that didn't provide a decent match to the frequencies you wanted to receive. The 7360 was also used as a balanced modulator in a number of 60's sweep tube SSB transceivers.
Pete, wa2cwa On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 09:42:23 -0500 Brett Gazdzinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, I never even seen a Squires Sanders receiver, let alone > listened > to one! > > I cant recall offhand any other receiver that used a 7360 > as a mixer, but need to look in my vacuum tube receiver book, > it lists all the receivers with their tube lineups. > > The ARRL sure liked the 7360, they used it in a lot of their > receiver projects, in the 1967 handbook anyway. > > I suspect the cost of a 7360 was lower back then, not sure why > its so expensive now, must be very rare? > > On the lower bands, I am not sure getting a really quiet mixer is > important at all, but have not tried the other designs yet. > > I never realized just how noisy some receivers are till the > first homebrew was done and compared it to the R390A. > I guess you think its atmospheric noise, or just get used > to it, but I cant stand the R390a anymore. > > > The first homebrew receiver is VERY quiet, but is an odd > design, I hope the new one is fairly quiet with the design > I picked. > If its not quiet, maybe I will try to duplicate the design of the > first receiver using a 7 or 9 pin tube in place of the 12SA7. > > I am sure there is a tube to replace the 12SA7 in a miniature > type. > Maybe I should have planned it that way from the start, go with > what you know works well, but trying other things is part of > the fun... > It will be easy to change the tube type if the first design > does not work out (6AH6, cathode injected LO). > > Brett > N2DTS > > > > > > The Squires Sanders SS-1R and SS-IBS both used a pair of > > 7360s. I never had > > a 1R, but I never thought the IBS worked noticeably better > > than any other > > relatively high end radio with more conventional vacuum tube > > mixer circuitry like > > the NC400 or the 51J4. And the thing was harder to align > > correctly as well > > (maybe that's why I won't impressed = never got it right:) Scott > > ________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!